Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:37:15 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>
Cc:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] extcon: Get rid of not really used name field in
 struct extcon_dev
Message-ID: <ZDVGay+hWCfPEVdu@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230405152745.24959-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20230405152745.24959-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <4632ce69-2a94-0c33-9a76-b97596436e24@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4632ce69-2a94-0c33-9a76-b97596436e24@gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 04:26:35AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 23. 4. 6. 00:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > -	const char *name;
> 
> No I don't want to remove the name even if the edev->name is equal
> with the parent's name. I might reduce the readability and understaning
> of the code user and I think that it is not good to use 'dev.parent' directly
> at multiple point.

Obviously I think otherwise. But you are the extcon maintainer, so I assume
that I have got NAK for these patches.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko