Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230320005258.1428043-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20230320005258.1428043-8-sashal@kernel.org>
 <CAN+4W8g6AcQQWe7rrBVOFYoqeQA-1VbUP_W7DPS3q0k-czOLfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZBiAPngOtzSwDhFz@kroah.com> <CAN+4W8jAyJTdFL=tgp3wCpYAjGOs5ggo6vyOg8PbaW+tJP8TKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN+4W8jAyJTdFL=tgp3wCpYAjGOs5ggo6vyOg8PbaW+tJP8TKA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:08:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAN+4W8j5qe6p3YV90g-E0VhV7AmYyAvt0z50dfDSombbGghkww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.2 08/30] selftests/bpf: check that modifier
 resolves after pointer
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
        ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
        shuah@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, eddyz87@gmail.com, sdf@google.com,
        error27@gmail.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, memxor@gmail.com,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:18=E2=80=AFAM Lorenz Bauer <lmb@isovalent.com> w=
rote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 3:48=E2=80=AFPM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.o=
rg> wrote:
> >
> > Why would it break?  Is that because the test is buggy, or the kernel i=
s
> > buggy?
>
> This test will be fine, but there have been several times when
> selftests/bpf for stable kernel releases didn't actually compile due
> to backported tests. This is because macros we're redefined, etc.
> Unless those also get picked (seems like a sisyphean task) we'll keep
> seeing broken selftests/bpf on stable.

Hi Greg, Sasha,

Following up on this since it seems to have fallen through the cracks.

Lorenz