Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <5f24cb94-d7f1-f8b0-71f0-2b39a89bb2dc@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:26:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.1
Cc:     savicaleksa83@gmail.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
        Jack Doan <me@jackdoan.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
        Leonard Anderweit <leonard.anderweit@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (aquacomputer_d5next) Fix alignment of function
 call params
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
References: <20230409183549.12683-1-savicaleksa83@gmail.com>
 <c24a071e-b191-4626-8edc-1658a01d80ef@roeck-us.net>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Aleksa Savic <savicaleksa83@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c24a071e-b191-4626-8edc-1658a01d80ef@roeck-us.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2023-04-10 18:53:08 GMT+02:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> 
> I am not sure I understand how this would improve readability.
> It seems to accomplish the opposite. Sure, I know, checkpatch --strict
> complains, but that is still better than unreadable code just to make
> checkpatch happy.
> 
> Guenter

Both seemed fine to me, the idea was to fix the checkpatch warning.
If it's OK for it to complain about this, plus the changes would make it
harder to read, please ignore this patch.

Thanks,
Aleksa