Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 21:52:33 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To:     Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Walker Chen <walker.chen@starfivetech.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/7] soc: starfive: Add pmu type operation
Message-ID: <20230411-flavoring-sternness-a3b6cdee9fcb@spud>
References: <20230411064743.273388-1-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
 <20230411064743.273388-5-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jTLzkgimlFJEOUu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230411064743.273388-5-changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
Precedence: bulk


--9jTLzkgimlFJEOUu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey Changhuang Liang,

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> Add pmu type, make a distinction between different PMU.

Please write more detailed commit messages, thanks.

>=20
> Signed-off-by: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/starfive/jh71xx_pmu.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/starfive/jh71xx_pmu.c b/drivers/soc/starfive/jh7=
1xx_pmu.c
> index 306218c83691..98f6849d61de 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/starfive/jh71xx_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/starfive/jh71xx_pmu.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
>   */
>  #define JH71XX_PMU_TIMEOUT_US		100
> =20
> +/* pmu type */

Delete this comment, it's obvious.

> +enum pmu_type {
> +	JH71XX_PMU_GENERAL,

I'm really not sold on GENERAL as a name.
Why not name these after the compatibles?

> +	JH71XX_PMU_DPHY,
> +};
> +
>  struct jh71xx_domain_info {
>  	const char * const name;
>  	unsigned int flags;
> @@ -54,6 +60,7 @@ struct jh71xx_domain_info {
>  struct jh71xx_pmu_match_data {
>  	const struct jh71xx_domain_info *domain_info;
>  	int num_domains;
> +	u8 pmu_type;

This is an enum, not a u8?

Thanks,
Conor.


--9jTLzkgimlFJEOUu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZDXIkQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0kByAP97IOiAFgI8nObj/x4ZMdTZk7xSaKs/qUUM2jPffnTMYQD+KVvBSO9lhyL7
NFR2FZ7jNsQX8DC9ZEqOFcs91Gip5A4=
=lb9a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9jTLzkgimlFJEOUu--