Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:15:54 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpio: 104-dio-48e: Implement struct dio48e_gpio
Message-ID: <db1edaaa-ea56-4f21-bc69-43f648e79c5b@sirena.org.uk>
References: <cover.1679323449.git.william.gray@linaro.org>
 <ca710d14a710fee44f7911f2a84b6a55570561ee.1679323449.git.william.gray@linaro.org>
 <571b4df1-91ea-481c-9797-842974dfa922@sirena.org.uk>
 <ZDWopwozNjFg/9NX@fedora>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sNpvF8yaJXR5s+zH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZDWopwozNjFg/9NX@fedora>
Precedence: bulk


--sNpvF8yaJXR5s+zH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 02:36:23PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:23:55PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:50:15AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > > A private data structure struct dio48e_gpio is introduced to facilitate
> > > passage of the regmap and IRQ mask state for the device to the callback
> > > dio48e_handle_mask_sync(). This is in preparation for the removal of the
> > > handle_mask_sync() map parameter in a subsequent patch.

> > What's the story with this patch?

> Currently dio48e_handle_mask_sync() uses the map argument in its
> implementation. Once the map parameter is removed, the current
> implementation of dio48e_handle_mask_sync() will no longer build, so we
> must adjust the implementation to no longer depend on map.

I mean what's the story with getting this patch applied?  It doesn't
seem to have been reviewed...

--sNpvF8yaJXR5s+zH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmQ1zgkACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9D+Sgf+Izhkz9XDgD7m+WF2bcdMC0Wa0wzbLVdlupuU+Z44aAnyk8B5aCio9o5R
1jraSVhUABdSEipqFlyfkuBlRwPRvs0u3xJlvaQa10I24pgoxE5veg4rqFax+BWD
QK6GowyMW3Lo+BK3N+8Ph0001s/D0ITKBLGTKL1Txo4MyjixNxsCXW0l51y0AQIk
txVttXiDekDBK55Y5bFTUXgU1leVJrhWwnTenv/lM+jvsdelxQZ//dPotyF/m8gb
NQ13hLo7PBbJKVpm8Jf5nrSzLKs/f/Sy8kFnQaxzfuYCMbknvQvee7GeOO2FmwyR
VYc2nEOma8I3H2tyZGLefk44ykElUw==
=vNxP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sNpvF8yaJXR5s+zH--