Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp831084rwl; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:53:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YLMHPB3Pkm6bR1WHz9dKK50WVMCmU/xh9dXshAWa51u+F56L4f8YrOteHQmYvxUdXtZoNw X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7b9f:b0:94a:5d8e:ddbf with SMTP id ne31-20020a1709077b9f00b0094a5d8eddbfmr13335193ejc.14.1681300412939; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:53:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681300412; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DHPfIkQ0iafidZm9L0GJ+IFw5IKQ6YhEVY1NTFDtVso07wO1eF6AA7pxAfhED2IUBa 3QsGYGtNyzgMttV53n5Ddn3LSKXZmQDF3rvhJgxjMizLFBGRQmttFm3RVooT16mG+H62 +xIlfhdHJFuW1oyMQOLFAh3oE5dEWnyYrFb38DVmcysg8oLWLUoqjUzuOAbFs1MYtGAt 9TP/HhObChU1ZwtWynOUTwAG0VXn/2SnFKfuc2ZiWbx90vRShgOxTybVhSO+0faMt6Fa sTTpeQgFKAIUUZf6n1Tn/68gLe65cjtWqi8mQ3sUY8olOQJRvU5RZ/RZH2ZX2F8MR2lY GzSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=p13YqXFGOIdtBHJwC2qwzAyWz6Qgh6+2djuWpFQo3gg=; b=z7+1QfFgb510rInGmtFosGz0mOq4ZIjK+PG7ZNfDy7uY8OlHjPgFFUbC6tje6vEKNO bVCmqjz4hb5vKY6yOhGTeT65HrjcdqpV/3X0hyNbYs/8nz/E13aRCwLoiSKRRstn/VeQ EXfWBI3/VkUBApGu3onaS6i9RhjGG25u0o2JygsDrXF/HvjTLnjpzHj0j5ReGfc4nTkp /xxYpIN7n7uR58lPvdCDc34TiOol4lBcYZbSHqVNL1euP1WnPD9FU7FJEbZMJusy14HW 0eh/PniDQmK5PbieIr+MMvgjs5A9mg1km/XZdtPLAGZpTMIgSYMp1JtObzFTlI3Ahij6 3p9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dd11-20020a1709069b8b00b0092fbf61b95csi990202ejc.50.2023.04.12.04.53.05; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229977AbjDLLuH (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:50:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56680 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229983AbjDLLuD (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:50:03 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B22230FF for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 04:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id A191668AA6; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:49:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:49:55 +0200 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Jinyoung CHOI Cc: "hch@lst.de" , "kbusch@kernel.org" , "axboe@fb.com" , "sagi@grimberg.me" , "chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" Subject: Re: (2) [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: fix metadata mapping length Message-ID: <20230412114955.GA9786@lst.de> References: <20230412065736.GB20550@lst.de> <20230412052443epcms2p836b669a12c4e81368bec2cd340656f73@epcms2p8> <20230412071230epcms2p145d53bfc8e40eede25f282b80247218c@epcms2p1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230412071230epcms2p145d53bfc8e40eede25f282b80247218c@epcms2p1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:12:30PM +0900, Jinyoung CHOI wrote: > I agree with you. > I think the problem is bio_integrity_add_page(). > If it is modified, sg functions for blk-integrity should also > be modified. > > If you think the blk-integrity modification is better, > I will send an mail to block mailing after modifying it. Please wait for feedback from Martin.