Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp874474rwl; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:29:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Z22JT5/+wXnPNVAJcEvxx4iBEKODYFgXmTrY3lOA1393tOeX0rnxr9dP0M1km0APgSH1P5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fe93:b0:246:c832:62e with SMTP id co19-20020a17090afe9300b00246c832062emr3031049pjb.11.1681302541219; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:29:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681302541; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UbaDSUP7R9Gk+8ggfZZW43ZJXZHiVQg20lTnMpVm9+OK0t6JIicnzI5/uxObaNbUSO yn5jjMZPeC85CYyogW1Fbib2dT7z0atbT0erLOObvXqb1VqyRNmpxRU/BZzcFkHJJrJn EKvv1WgqAjE1AdcjKTXo8D1yLDpEjxYHhI7oOhP0Qu4hHwV/6SXnc39DxX+KSe7TbG5k PPyub0agAwnD59XwKnCPhjNvT2yMZbzwJC1pgpIdYnlkQT1Dd9b8Bp2S3TllYOsspItb UpH8Akvx08OGgC3+JUj/hP1Jt+lvjSiDCR31QapDAMOYZyDLzdfD5SLpe6GgX6Li1H69 qv6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:dkim-signature; bh=Ari64ibrXeBZr1oJcL8eONeaaIGC3ERYNDijfDPX6C0=; b=e9ayF4AQ0ZzT55XH9r1n7KsXC5L7nK2feQrDGRI0aWAgCelkiVgm70U1wvALvxHphN b3emkIPQpaVRcs9QBDJux2fsqmS2h83IvpnIbpe2RFqL0y24/iEyItmtClzaW/9qN8TS lPllEAQJ6g7hulIcRSDN6RbzHcJ+ii2KY4Us3+RqVgvPvajeogGsQcuLM8RIH0kV6RTL m4ApQVCQ/lAXEK0hLCroE36vcAo5EO62d0Xyq1WZ1i52QPr2GROlF17hlpsqcPKFELrB cRHzdUBsVvCNO97jD+p28qoAu8XR9bWuX5mgs1wTeqm8IWaDrq88LH/4QJlcIjxuByit i1wA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=gm1 header.b="H/6tM8Io"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=bootlin.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gx7-20020a17090b124700b0023fbb212145si1716851pjb.175.2023.04.12.05.28.49; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bootlin.com header.s=gm1 header.b="H/6tM8Io"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=bootlin.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229812AbjDLMSd (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:18:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57428 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229661AbjDLMSb (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:18:31 -0400 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net (relay11.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D5851FEA for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (Authenticated sender: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8495100005; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:18:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1681301907; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ari64ibrXeBZr1oJcL8eONeaaIGC3ERYNDijfDPX6C0=; b=H/6tM8Io1DfAGX9v9ttE5SkAZGoMGZAsc3DWINLyZClBbGTac3EizJwsJWf+yGjAB836eY 7Ki6Gh9ALfuigZ9lkTuby6lFqvQ2hdS9AU459CD1M8I01JfLc462cE6P7T7s/w4VLN7sFh 0WAMY3oiY5QFX5qSd/bARXk07qI4mprDQyQKYrH33HBEVFPuOPYshbOn1zt5a1d2+E/rD6 2TaOKYIS3CVBuHso2mL19Agnjt/eftcyRW6U5O3XqE6bGZWBtOWtg9GTAHeoQQ7dk9SwJr FR8sIOTLA2NXfBF+fwKn9qgda0LPjdHRoOR4LWHJessuxZ17V38mAvFI121sSg== Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:18:24 +0200 From: Miquel Raynal To: Arseniy Krasnov Cc: Liang Yang , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Neil Armstrong , Kevin Hilman , Jerome Brunet , Martin Blumenstingl , Jianxin Pan , Yixun Lan , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] mtd: rawnand: meson: clear OOB buffer before read Message-ID: <20230412141824.755b2bca@xps-13> In-Reply-To: <4eace0a0-f6af-7d99-a52f-7913a2139330@sberdevices.ru> References: <20230412061700.1492474-1-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> <20230412061700.1492474-5-AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> <20230412094400.3c82f631@xps-13> <20230412113654.183350d0@xps-13> <4eace0a0-f6af-7d99-a52f-7913a2139330@sberdevices.ru> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arseniy, avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru wrote on Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:14:52 +0300: > On 12.04.2023 12:36, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Arseniy, > >=20 > > avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru wrote on Wed, 12 Apr 2023 12:20:55 +0300: > > =20 > >> On 12.04.2023 10:44, Miquel Raynal wrote: =20 > >>> Hi Arseniy, > >>> > >>> AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru wrote on Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:16:58 +0300: > >>> =20 > >>>> This NAND reads only few user's bytes in ECC mode (not full OOB), so= =20 > >>> > >>> "This NAND reads" does not look right, do you mean "Subpage reads do > >>> not retrieve all the OOB bytes,"? > >>> =20 > >>>> fill OOB buffer with zeroes to not return garbage from previous reads > >>>> to user. > >>>> Otherwise 'nanddump' utility prints something like this for just era= sed > >>>> page: > >>>> > >>>> ... > >>>> 0x000007f0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > >>>> OOB Data: ff ff ff ff 00 00 ff ff 80 cf 22 99 cb ad d3 be > >>>> OOB Data: 63 27 ae 06 16 0a 2f eb bb dd 46 74 41 8e 88 6e > >>>> OOB Data: 38 a1 2d e6 77 d4 05 06 f2 a5 7e 25 eb 34 7c ff > >>>> OOB Data: 38 ea de 14 10 de 9b 40 33 16 6a cc 9d aa 2f 5e > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 5 +++++ > >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/ra= w/meson_nand.c > >>>> index f84a10238e4d..f2f2472cb511 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c > >>>> @@ -858,9 +858,12 @@ static int meson_nfc_read_page_sub(struct nand_= chip *nand, > >>>> static int meson_nfc_read_page_raw(struct nand_chip *nand, u8 *buf, > >>>> int oob_required, int page) > >>>> { > >>>> + struct mtd_info *mtd =3D nand_to_mtd(nand); > >>>> u8 *oob_buf =3D nand->oob_poi; > >>>> int ret; > >>>> =20 > >>>> + memset(oob_buf, 0, mtd->oobsize); =20 > >>> > >>> I'm surprised raw reads do not read the entire OOB? =20 > >> > >> Yes! Seems in case of raw access (what i see in this driver) number of= OOB bytes read > >> still depends on ECC parameters: for each portion of data covered with= ECC code we can > >> read it's ECC code and "user bytes" from OOB - it is what i see by dum= ping DMA buffer by > >> printk(). For example I'm working with 2K NAND pages, each page has 2 = x 1K ECC blocks. > >> For each ECC block I have 16 OOB bytes which I can access by read/writ= e. Each 16 bytes > >> contains 2 bytes of user's data and 14 bytes ECC codes. So when I read= page in raw mode > >> controller returns 32 bytes (2 x (2 + 14)) of OOB. While OOB is report= ed as 64 bytes. =20 > >=20 > > In all modes, when you read OOB, you should get the full OOB. The fact > > that ECC correction is enabled or disabled does not matter. If the NAND > > features OOB sections of 64 bytes, you should get the 64 bytes. > >=20 > > What happens sometimes, is that some of the bytes are not protected > > against bitflips, but the policy is to return the full buffer. =20 >=20 > Ok, so to clarify case for this NAND controller: > 1) In both ECC and raw modes i need to return the same raw OOB data (e.g.= user bytes > + ECC codes)? Well, you need to cover the same amount of data, yes. But in the ECC case the data won't be raw (at least not all of it). > 2) If I have access to only 32 bytes of OOB (in case above), I must repor= t that size > of OOB is only 32 bytes during initialization? I believe it's just an implementation error in the controller driver. This controller can be used on NAND chips with other geometries, please don't play with it. Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l