Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp1042536rwl; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:33:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZHQAEIqcFLjOzwfOD5EAOCva5NlugUQeo9LODfSfysRt3fQx/N6UBfkNKzI7ScqsztbQku X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:674e:b0:94b:466b:a492 with SMTP id qm14-20020a170907674e00b0094b466ba492mr10370861ejc.19.1681310019704; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:33:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681310019; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ze9hiilhypUi8odlNmw079FnfPuN/4YYAmy7UbNBjhBn1AfaIn2F3VcMny58GxVyPO dW3kcoadMjZZaFD2QRdm7bVuj9YezDJkMHK9nqEH2gTX/MG1I99PqPGzK/QHz0rNu+/d Ltq8IRpOge+D1mWRWjqZXNNyRMkhj1keyQEGZMPKCboi3rxB/Au5N0QfGnX0DLHzpUNH zZiT5ttIN+8HiW25vWJ5mkjhBm+fVmmvNQ5Jht065bQ3NB8HxGQujN7fdpnJy1MdI6WT g1u7BG4LLuwbxVL3xsG855J65IQAJwKmjEzHpKH48OHerMMv56jBKQAOkwFbyDGA6HTI 19uw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=g3csUU+MZIL4psk3MHBw1EHOXxochpb77aPV46ZLfuc=; b=nums3E4l+8MDR++E+Altb/MXJlwb7jcjuIN7kLhUyQFVClZp5TZ3P9u7+HH8LZfcq3 npU3KlZaTL+qiL0Hd6ZE4cKpgYP9H7uBkpvPQfgkNxcM7dOXim3Vueh7kvLoUG4s32XK k+GJ5IiuMP8TqxKaW0leQ0YFJST0bPq8vxUpIA8dQQMCL4JPrfnI+lv4Ia8qw071zUNs AiIQZZ0PNnuM4YQYaUXZn03TOknwxjkG0MlCYvAkTRnkz2jELDLTFAjeEfsgj7Jsie4r 2IB52h7XLRdrTv6dOrVvPTapVZ5+rI5oew0ouqz6AxlxK6SjGvieJ+oymnjR8blpzvIf JumA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=aI6Q+2c2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id un7-20020a170907cb8700b0094a52f3f042si6121637ejc.104.2023.04.12.07.33.14; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=aI6Q+2c2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231577AbjDLO2w (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:28:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56058 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230257AbjDLO2v (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:28:51 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45470192; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id y26so9980006qtv.9; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:28:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681309722; x=1683901722; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:references :in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=g3csUU+MZIL4psk3MHBw1EHOXxochpb77aPV46ZLfuc=; b=aI6Q+2c2WaaTUQarPujC9vC4U+H06kMJ1qHxGql7eaQVoNPr4VI6/vTF20Gq0LrCOd JUDyMJIC+/nGqr4gtxOQDYTlG2rqjsjPSXCJYVDyNnU7/visH6dzicAcsw917ORO/PW+ B+kYVJaEtQZ45dAnLsOgIl9PZq6Zz8f7E5ziG10GSCSsba7CEp8sJDNhd9m92KhZoJMd +CEN2d4h/EVQRnzpA5ZyXzrN/4q9QwRHGNJXRrCpW0MUpzEmo2oEht0vdZE92tU7+cew 0TtCqPXhwtAvPD1w+obFG/+LpXEfiMk9/oSZ3bZaBHgysbET3Mze4e+lQ9YDtaTuv2Bo Kt8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681309722; x=1683901722; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:references :in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g3csUU+MZIL4psk3MHBw1EHOXxochpb77aPV46ZLfuc=; b=DiKMVrzcMCsauSyS/R4BARQbmdEvArJFT5jQqMHSC1NHcz+iFb/Mu4gbCEnrRnSp4u rOWRfNA3/Uv0I4sifQ5dGpaktwjRlQOqzHbcjOOTEeQh0gDxTUr3EcheVCiXlEyG0ohc MCh6BYUR80A2+Ezjr5/LHAq7pekF4x5402eaFBuygsqFtOOg+muHasvtm2CObjQt46fl 5SUfLAp6s2r1X38m8lOwnNwCBYtzvV7kdU0gD8uWxD8FdAmfhIFfiEAqcoe5yNFw7DX1 8ZHU4hWQbtSu3u5wtC/QtCE5oG3d4inatbpqaAvXd0WDteLCHlldQIZFTJEA7gjbaA19 EVuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9c9JNhkxfXV3ew46T0qtj5I3OV2EPxBHeI5z/eU/mwVifqXAWAZ FArkv8cqe7ewDT+/l6KTrV0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:14e:b0:3e3:3941:d167 with SMTP id v14-20020a05622a014e00b003e33941d167mr29755868qtw.34.1681309722274; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (240.157.150.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.150.157.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12-20020a37aa0c000000b007468b183a65sm257126qke.30.2023.04.12.07.28.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:28:41 -0400 From: Willem de Bruijn To: Breno Leitao , Jens Axboe Cc: Willem de Bruijn , David Ahern , Willem de Bruijn , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com, leit@fb.com, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, dccp@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthieu.baerts@tessares.net, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com Message-ID: <6436c01979c9b_163b6294b4@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> In-Reply-To: References: <75e3c434-eb8b-66e5-5768-ca0f906979a1@kernel.org> <67831406-8d2f-feff-f56b-d0f002a95d96@kernel.dk> <643573df81e20_11117c2942@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> <036c80e5-4844-5c84-304c-7e553fe17a9b@kernel.dk> <64357608c396d_113ebd294ba@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> <19c69021-dce3-1a4a-00eb-920d1f404cfc@kernel.dk> <64357bb97fb19_114b22294c4@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch> <20cb4641-c765-e5ef-41cb-252be7721ce5@kernel.dk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] add initial io_uring_cmd support for sockets Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Breno Leitao wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 09:28:29AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 4/11/23 9:24?AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > >> On 4/11/23 9:00?AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > >> But that doesn't work, because sock->ops->ioctl() assumes the arg is > > >> memory in userspace. Or do you mean change all of the sock->ops->ioctl() > > >> to pass in on-stack memory (or similar) and have it work with a kernel > > >> address? > > > > > > That was what I suggested indeed. > > > > > > It's about as much code change as this patch series. But it avoids > > > the code duplication. > > > > Breno, want to tackle that as a prep patch first? Should make the > > functional changes afterwards much more straightforward, and will allow > > support for anything really. > > Absolutely. I just want to make sure that I got the proper approach that > we agreed here. > > Let me explain what I understood taking TCP as an example: > > 1) Rename tcp_ioctl() to something as _tcp_ioctl() where the 'arg' > argument is now just a kernel memory (located in the stack frame from the > callee). > > 2) Recreate "tcp_ioctl()" that will basically allocate a 'arg' in the > stack and call _tcp_ioctl() passing that 'arg' argument. At the bottom of > this (tcp_ioctl() function) function, call `put_user(in_kernel_arg, userspace_arg) > > 3) Repeat it for the 20 protocols that implement ioctl: > > ag "struct proto .* = {" -A 20 net/ | grep \.ioctl > net/dccp/ipv6.c .ioctl = dccp_ioctl, > net/dccp/ipv4.c .ioctl = dccp_ioctl, > net/ieee802154/socket.c .ioctl = dgram_ioctl, > net/ipv4/udplite.c .ioctl = udp_ioctl, > net/ipv4/raw.c .ioctl = raw_ioctl, > net/ipv4/udp.c .ioctl = udp_ioctl, > net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c .ioctl = tcp_ioctl, > net/ipv6/raw.c .ioctl = rawv6_ioctl, > net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c .ioctl = tcp_ioctl, > net/ipv6/udp.c .ioctl = udp_ioctl, > net/ipv6/udplite.c .ioctl = udp_ioctl, > net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c .ioctl = l2tp_ioctl, > net/l2tp/l2tp_ip.c .ioctl = l2tp_ioctl, > net/phonet/datagram.: .ioctl = pn_ioctl, > net/phonet/pep.c .ioctl = pep_ioctl, > net/rds/af_rds.c .ioctl = rds_ioctl, > net/sctp/socket.c .ioctl = sctp_ioctl, > net/sctp/socket.c .ioctl = sctp_ioctl, > net/xdp/xsk.c .ioctl = sock_no_ioctl, > net/mptcp/protocol.c .ioctl = mptcp_ioctl, > > Am I missing something? The suggestion is to convert all to take kernel memory and do the put_cmsg in the caller of .ioctl. Rather than create a wrapper for each individual instance and add a separate .iouring_cmd for each. "change all of the sock->ops->ioctl() to pass in on-stack memory (or similar) and have it work with a kernel address"