Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752898AbXIZELU (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:11:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750986AbXIZELK (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:11:10 -0400 Received: from mo10.iij4u.or.jp ([210.138.174.78]:38082 "EHLO mo10.iij4u.or.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750863AbXIZELJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:11:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:10:47 +0900 To: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com Cc: tomof@acm.org, jeff@garzik.org, matthew@wil.cx, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp Subject: Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24 From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: <1190779313.8707.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1190778353.8707.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070925092106U.tomof@acm.org> <1190779313.8707.42.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20070925093611I.tomof@acm.org> X-Dispatcher: imput version 20050308(IM148) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2216 Lines: 48 On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:01:53 -0500 James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 12:55 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:53 -0500 > > James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 23:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:37:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > >> Are there any const-ness worries for scsi_host_template, or plans for > > > > >> the future? I do not see any other examples of the host template > > > > >> members getting modified. > > > > > > > > > > Goodness, Jeff, you haven't looked too hard. There's dozens of examples > > > > > I've come across trawling the horrible unmaintained drivers. I'd love > > > > > to see scsi_host_template become const, but it's not happening any time > > > > > soon, and we can address this little piece when the time comes. > > > > > > > > Well, sure, the driver is the owner of that memory. > > > > > > > > We're talking about common code. > > > > > > > > If everybody agrees SHT is R/W in the core, Fujita-san's patch is fine. > > > > > > Well, I don't like mucking with the template either. > > > > > > This whole mess is generated basically because the zero default of the > > > template should be treated as initiator. How about this, which makes > > > that manifest? > > > > But how can we handle dual-mode drivers? > > > > luce:/sys/class/scsi_host/host0$ cat supported_mode > > Initiator, Target > > > > > > The values are not enumerated. They are like FC_PORT_ROLE. > > Any driver that does other than the default INITIATOR has to set it in > the template. The code only defaults zero (which is what the templates > get if its unset) to MODE_INITIATOR. Oh yeah, the patch is fine. I just wanted to say that supported_mode/active_mode are designed not to be enumerated and we can't just set INITIATOR to zero and TARGET to non-zero. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/