Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:37:23 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>,
        Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= <kw@linux.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: brcmstb: Add two optional props
Message-ID: <20230412153723.GA2473030-robh@kernel.org>
References: <20230411165919.23955-1-jim2101024@gmail.com>
 <20230411165919.23955-2-jim2101024@gmail.com>
 <5a28e520-63e4-dbcf-5b3e-e5097f02dea2@linaro.org>
 <78c18cdb-5757-8d30-e2a6-414f09505cc6@gmail.com>
 <66b7d0b9-9569-ddaf-89ca-5a0133074a17@linaro.org>
 <CANCKTBtZt9QRkT4yAW5LsfHGf5TTL7tQ025H42+PPEi-=rWE8A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CANCKTBtZt9QRkT4yAW5LsfHGf5TTL7tQ025H42+PPEi-=rWE8A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:14:46AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/04/2023 13:49, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/12/2023 1:09 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >> On 11/04/2023 18:59, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > >>> Regarding "brcm,enable-l1ss":
> > >>>
> > >>>    The Broadcom STB/CM PCIe HW -- a core that is also used by RPi SOCs --
> > >>>    requires the driver probe() to deliberately place the HW one of three
> > >>>    CLKREQ# modes:
> > >>>
> > >>>    (a) CLKREQ# driven by the RC unconditionally
> > >>>    (b) CLKREQ# driven by the EP for ASPM L0s, L1
> > >>>    (c) Bidirectional CLKREQ#, as used for L1 Substates (L1SS).
> > >>>
> > >>>    The HW+driver can tell the difference between downstream devices that
> > >>>    need (a) and (b), but does not know when to configure (c).  Further, the
> > >>>    HW may cause a CPU abort on boot if guesses wrong regarding the need for
> > >>>    (c).  So we introduce the boolean "brcm,enable-l1ss" property to indicate
> > >>>    that (c) is desired.  Setting this property only makes sense when the
> > >>>    downstream device is L1SS-capable and the OS is configured to activate
> > >>>    this mode (e.g. policy==superpowersave).
> > >>>
> > >>>    This property is already present in the Raspian version of Linux, but the
> > >>>    upstream driver implementaion that will follow adds more details and
> > >>
> > >> typo, implementation
> > >>
> > >>>    discerns between (a) and (b).
> > >>>
> > >>> Regarding "brcm,completion-timeout-us"
> > >>>
> > >>>    Our HW will cause a CPU abort if the L1SS exit time is longer than the
> > >>>    PCIe transaction completion abort timeout.  We've been asked to make this
> > >>>    configurable, so we are introducing "brcm,completion-timeout-us".
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > >> What happened here? Where is the changelog?
> > >
> > > It is in the cover letter:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230411165919.23955-1-jim2101024@gmail.com/
> > >
> > > but it does not look like the cover letter was copied to you or Rob.
> >
> > As you said, I did not get it.
> 
> Yes, sorry about that; I use a wrapper over the "cocci_cc" script and
> I need to modify one or both scripts to send the cover to the
> superset of recipients in the constituent commits.

Try out 'b4'. It's much easier.

In any case, I don't read cover letters. Changes to a patch belong with 
the patch.

Rob