Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:28:05 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
        Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Cai Huoqing <cai.huoqing@linux.dev>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 00/10] PCI: dwc: Relatively simple fixes and
 cleanups
Message-ID: <ZDbjHTenZMxfziZD@matsya>
References: <20230411033928.30397-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
 <20230411110240.GB5333@thinkpad>
 <20230411165924.4zfwhwxacxxeg7rk@mobilestation>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230411165924.4zfwhwxacxxeg7rk@mobilestation>
Precedence: bulk

On 11-04-23, 19:59, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:32:40PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 06:39:18AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > It turns out the recent DW PCIe-related patchset was merged in with
> > > several relatively trivial issues left unsettled (noted by Bjorn and
> > > Manivannan). All of these lefovers have been fixed in this patchset.
> > > Namely the series starts with two bug-fixes. The first one concerns the
> > > improper link-mode initialization in case if the CDM-check is enabled. The
> > > second unfortunate mistake I made in the IP-core version type helper. In
> > > particular instead of testing the IP-core version type the macro function
> > > referred to the just IP-core version which obviously wasn't what I
> > > intended.
> > > 
> > > Afterwards two @Mani-noted fixes follow. Firstly the dma-ranges related warning
> > > message is fixed to start with "DMA-ranges" word instead of "Dma-ranges".
> > > Secondly the Baikal-T1 PCIe Host driver is converted to perform the
> > > asynchronous probe type which saved us of about 15% of bootup time if no any
> > > PCIe peripheral device attached to the port.
> > > 
> > > Then the patchset contains the Baikal-T1 PCIe driver fix. The
> > > corresponding patch removes the false error message printed during the
> > > controller probe procedure. I accidentally added the unconditional
> > > dev_err_probe() method invocation. It was obviously wrong.
> > > 
> > > Then two trivial cleanups are introduced. The first one concerns the
> > > duplicated fast-link-mode flag unsetting. The second one implies
> > > dropping a redundant empty line from the dw_pcie_link_set_max_speed()
> > > function.
> > > 
> > > The series continues with a patch inspired by the last @Bjorn note
> > > regarding the generic resources request interface. As @Bjorn correctly
> > > said it would be nice to have the new interface used wider in the DW PCIe
> > > subsystem. Aside with the Baikal-T1 PCIe Host driver the Toshiba Visconti
> > > PCIe driver can be easily converted to using the generic clock names.
> > > That's what is done in the noted patch.
> > > 
> > > The patchset is closed with a series of MAINTAINERS-list related patches.
> > > Firstly after getting the DW PCIe RP/EP DT-schemas refactored I forgot to
> > > update the MAINTAINER-list with the new files added in the framework of
> > > that procedure. All the snps,dw-pcie* schemas shall be maintained by the
> > > DW PCIe core driver maintainers. Secondly seeing how long it took for my
> > > patchsets to review and not having any comments from the original driver
> > > maintainers I'd suggest to add myself as the reviewer to the DW PCIe and
> > > eDMA drivers. Thus hopefully the new updates review process will be
> > > performed with much less latencies. For the same reason I would also like
> > > to suggest to add @Manivannan as the DW PCIe/eDMA drivers maintainer if
> > > he isn't against that idea. What do you think about the last suggestion?
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm willing to co-maintain the drivers.
> 
> Awesome! @Bjorn, @Lorenzo, @Vinod what do you think about this? If you
> are ok with that shall I resubmit the series with @Mani added to the
> DW PCIe/eDMA maintainers list or will you create the respective
> patches yourself?

Pls send the patch, that is preferred.

-- 
~Vinod