Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp1377470rwl; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:51:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZpA2lZ16G5f+bOVNWhyNNGjHPdh63cpWsEOsjcb4QDJaqLW8S8XRhvQEIgC8g1vEKRi7/8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9519:b0:94a:5402:da29 with SMTP id u25-20020a170906951900b0094a5402da29mr7239438ejx.19.1681325510806; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:51:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681325510; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ojlz/8uRp50XFm79DGA5+4mP63LgMOScHfs9CgPzxJO+sGevi1PjGMHvnBLLTTYrlB LzNKlZTwmORXWXu+Y7MBMDrWFGRSTcV3i4thGSaFZ/R3UGu9Kc8nYmwUdC7iV6tTk1p/ SJSQNeDPy/HT7VeMK3SeE7Tpenb4rlVdMpcrh7RdSnN3gPWLh6YNzMes66U9qXH5kKLy llfvXASwBr36V3HYMT+gkAfq6Aim55afrgkvfmX7RWG3VsM8YnUTYr2I3SorDVol8EPA b13Kcm7Xw0olFEzZ8xTH4LP3FL3JE4a3ZSECKHan1s9cWitnGje45bMYH650a+rABiPa KnCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=v7KC9QUBQaRmwJIcKPRsjcOkffavLHC13KK+SVfmZhY=; b=H/hLPoToDEDtOivzWLMt7Au6sr32Uc4/GlwUQpcVh7zmG7Xcoq71EyQO/+KIyl0NmS /Ly+D2TP4ix4bgs6wR9oRfWXjm7YUCStbevYkC277EOyS9TwNgSPw3NejTexxIZaYCSn RgxsBgqQmAEJEzAFr6Gr38rFV4QXzUhlN2D2eddrcK9H+XTXHywc0aLOPZvmLAay3vIn 5exY9KE+99USdj/C1HxuD080UyAuHT1Sr0jpEw2XXtbzA2ihun5F3bVSqWvRGqgrDT1h ggTMEbKZ3DQO2i28lgBlFvKrIDKGi4qJbrlJ09LhPldQjzkF4DSkFf/2hFQUcw3RA9xO 9WiQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=r2ubmuT1; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=qFelM2v5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a9-20020a1709063e8900b009446b037852si4155891ejj.708.2023.04.12.11.51.24; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=r2ubmuT1; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=qFelM2v5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229831AbjDLSqt (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:46:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57526 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229864AbjDLSqr (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:46:47 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A18B7ED1; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43AF11F8A6; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:45:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1681325150; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v7KC9QUBQaRmwJIcKPRsjcOkffavLHC13KK+SVfmZhY=; b=r2ubmuT1bEJy/iK41oz0vJbVQz0yxxI03nokIHDEWOJM+Dz2UNGRnc8Y3LrIIG11ZfQWSY MKGMiM9Qqb2ocuZODVaYeqUaRCYatCxWyBIa9jB1lgmJF+yKQTUjGgL61Vl36VvB93VDdh OuSLsXQLol7s5RzmYy9DlxzL7ckrFtQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1681325150; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v7KC9QUBQaRmwJIcKPRsjcOkffavLHC13KK+SVfmZhY=; b=qFelM2v5vwaQ/GXOFO8h7gzxupTFQgRvMmEhOT4zsD/syUNmDzW/pbhgqAmRIySONFz+s/ wSKp00/RDMe+7VDA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C62D613498; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id MhFLL138NmRECAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:45:49 +0000 Received: by quack3.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6DCBCA0732; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:45:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:45:45 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Baokun Li Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, ritesh.list@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] ext4: only update i_reserved_data_blocks on successful block allocation Message-ID: <20230412184545.golqryhkygpke4ja@quack3> References: <20230412124126.2286716-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> <20230412124126.2286716-2-libaokun1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230412124126.2286716-2-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 12-04-23 20:41:19, Baokun Li wrote: > In our fault injection test, we create an ext4 file, migrate it to > non-extent based file, then punch a hole and finally trigger a WARN_ON > in the ext4_da_update_reserve_space(): > > EXT4-fs warning (device sda): ext4_da_update_reserve_space:369: > ino 14, used 11 with only 10 reserved data blocks > > When writing back a non-extent based file, if we enable delalloc, the > number of reserved blocks will be subtracted from the number of blocks > mapped by ext4_ind_map_blocks(), and the extent status tree will be > updated. We update the extent status tree by first removing the old > extent_status and then inserting the new extent_status. If the block range > we remove happens to be in an extent, then we need to allocate another > extent_status with ext4_es_alloc_extent(). > > use old to remove to add new > |----------|------------|------------| > old extent_status > > The problem is that the allocation of a new extent_status failed due to a > fault injection, and __es_shrink() did not get free memory, resulting in > a return of -ENOMEM. Then do_writepages() retries after receiving -ENOMEM, > we map to the same extent again, and the number of reserved blocks is again > subtracted from the number of blocks in that extent. Since the blocks in > the same extent are subtracted twice, we end up triggering WARN_ON at > ext4_da_update_reserve_space() because used > ei->i_reserved_data_blocks. > > For non-extent based file, we update the number of reserved blocks after > ext4_ind_map_blocks() is executed, which causes a problem that when we call > ext4_ind_map_blocks() to create a block, it doesn't always create a block, > but we always reduce the number of reserved blocks. So we move the logic > for updating reserved blocks to ext4_ind_map_blocks() to ensure that the > number of reserved blocks is updated only after we do succeed in allocating > some new blocks. > > Fixes: 5f634d064c70 ("ext4: Fix quota accounting error with fallocate") > Signed-off-by: Baokun Li Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > V1->V2: > Modify the patch description and add the Fixes tag. > V2->V3: > Remove the redundant judgment of count. > > fs/ext4/indirect.c | 8 ++++++++ > fs/ext4/inode.c | 10 ---------- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/indirect.c b/fs/ext4/indirect.c > index c68bebe7ff4b..a9f3716119d3 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/indirect.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/indirect.c > @@ -651,6 +651,14 @@ int ext4_ind_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, > > ext4_update_inode_fsync_trans(handle, inode, 1); > count = ar.len; > + > + /* > + * Update reserved blocks/metadata blocks after successful block > + * allocation which had been deferred till now. > + */ > + if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) > + ext4_da_update_reserve_space(inode, count, 1); > + > got_it: > map->m_flags |= EXT4_MAP_MAPPED; > map->m_pblk = le32_to_cpu(chain[depth-1].key); > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index 97eb728cb958..33ae92f0ddfb 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -659,16 +659,6 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, > */ > ext4_clear_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_EXT_MIGRATE); > } > - > - /* > - * Update reserved blocks/metadata blocks after successful > - * block allocation which had been deferred till now. We don't > - * support fallocate for non extent files. So we can update > - * reserve space here. > - */ > - if ((retval > 0) && > - (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE)) > - ext4_da_update_reserve_space(inode, retval, 1); > } > > if (retval > 0) { > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR