Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/164] 6.1.24-rc1 review
From:   Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net>
In-Reply-To: <20230412082836.695875037@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:17:43 -0400
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>, rwarsow@gmx.de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C9920C31-41F9-4AC8-B0DC-50A89BC5964E@sladewatkins.net>
References: <20230412082836.695875037@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk


> On Apr 12, 2023, at 4:32 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman =
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.24 release.
> There are 164 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, =
please
> let me know.
>=20
> Responses should be made by Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:28:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>=20
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> =
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.24-rc=
1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> =
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git =
linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>=20
> thanks,
>=20
> greg k-h


Compiled & booted on two of my x86_64 test systems, no errors or =
regressions.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net =
<mailto:srw@sladewatkins.net>>

Slade=