Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758382AbXIZLQm (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:16:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754213AbXIZLQf (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:16:35 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:40534 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753539AbXIZLQe (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:16:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:20:28 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: David Newall Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Bill Davidsen , Philipp Marek , 7eggert@gmx.de, majkls , bunk@fs.tum.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Chroot bug Message-ID: <20070926122028.5f842d1e@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <46FA3D4B.20805@davidnewall.com> References: <56705.193.171.152.61.1190289559.squirrel@webmail.marek.priv.at> <46F29A9A.4070806@davidnewall.com> <200709201817.17282@x5> <46F2B59F.8090709@davidnewall.com> <46F2DDD0.3030500@tmr.com> <46F380E4.4040606@davidnewall.com> <20070924213215.GA32716@vino.hallyn.com> <46F83474.5040503@davidnewall.com> <20070924230008.GA3160@vino.hallyn.com> <46F8BC8A.7080006@davidnewall.com> <20070925114947.GA9721@vino.hallyn.com> <46F91417.9050600@davidnewall.com> <46F924E3.50205@davidnewall.com> <20070925163040.12a3c2f8@the-village.bc.nu> <46F92AAB.1060903@davidnewall.com> <20070925164806.4cadc6a5@the-village.bc.nu> <46F99EDE.70905@davidnewall.com> <20070926011847.49bbb9a2@the-village.bc.nu> <46FA334F.7030802@davidnewall.com> <20070926114729.3b9d1fb4@the-village.bc.nu> <46FA3D4B.20805@davidnewall.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1185 Lines: 28 > >>> The dot-dot entry in the root directory is interpreted to mean the > >>> root directory itself. Thus, dot-dot cannot be used to access files > >>> outside the subtree rooted at the root directory. > >>> > > > > Which is behaviour chroot preserves properly. > > > And yet it is the dot-dot entry which is used to access files outside > the root. Read it again, and read all the words. Notably "the dot-dot entry *IN* the root directory". When your current directory is above your root directory you do not pass through that dot-dot entry. > Do you believe that when those words were first written, the hidden > conflict, namely that it permits dot-dot to access files outside the > subtree, was understood? Yes. You need to remember the notion of chroot for "security" is a very new one, and not one that it was designed for. Which as I've said twice now is why things like vserver and BSD jails have evolved. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/