Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <167e4a8c-3ebd-92b7-1481-947f08901f97@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:32:27 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: snps,dwc3: Add
 'snps,global-regs-starting-offset' quirk
To:     Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@realtek.com>,
        Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
Cc:     linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
References: <20230412033006.10859-2-stanley_chang@realtek.com>
 <20230413042503.4047-1-stanley_chang@realtek.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230413042503.4047-1-stanley_chang@realtek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 13/04/2023 06:25, Stanley Chang wrote:
> Add a new 'snps,global-regs-starting-offset' DT to dwc3 core to remap
> the global register start address
> 
> The RTK DHC SoCs were designed the global register address offset at
> 0x8100. The default address is at DWC3_GLOBALS_REGS_START (0xc100).
> Therefore, add the property of device-tree to adjust this start address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chang <stanley_chang@realtek.com>
> ---
>  v1 to v2 change:
> 1. Change the name of the property "snps,global-regs-starting-offset".
> ---

Didn't you got already comment for this patch? How did you implement it?

Also, I asked you multiple times:

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC.  It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries.  Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

I don't understand why you ignore this.

NAK, patch is not correct.

Best regards,
Krzysztof