Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp2151367rwl; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:17:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YWSbnE7opKPhQaELGlk3z/maoKWzHam2HUidPgf74GYBB8VZ2DE6EvIyXxtOTz/cTSNMq4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:770c:b0:947:3d04:61dc with SMTP id q12-20020a170906770c00b009473d0461dcmr1824126ejm.77.1681377465614; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:17:45 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681377465; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lC3a3EiQeHKVo7Laztj7/3vKwzpc51/L9kDUfuTZyPjB9ujP/hf6P+jaEP73XyS3/K TwuSqYP7WQwVJ/H7SgL26D3Xojvu14cCJuQ7+ElwLJzJEd2Dt6+wBka2xPkjcMJIOqVt bwxblST3L4KAdx18s/wVWVnVyOOHwxWUpKu5dS661zZV3JHd/P/zS8c4C1yJiLvpePQt ATNL4kwDVAC7wmL7ZmvQJQmvM4LyBv7ucA8jGhFkSvqngRr4C5I3pxugT42vrw4jzmh2 eEBYd0/PrICtSgP+jgJ9rUhuIq2DCmuJ/cpp6NPAPX31JX6OFLRcK9tZJBY3UpkT27P0 wdlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Z8zPpumt5O4NM0t7Fqyztud8RHCmk3s6Ym5WFUdUmOU=; b=UIJrYDvC3lXTfLjbcuAgZaQPGL/SiTHa+1Tz3wgJcMnmA/YIX1TYuB09VarTVIoCHy RrMARvkj3SRplyTibmDLjZ3RLHzOI21oCECmlDSpR+BZpIGpCDj7XEeUbvvtE6+j7hFR KMO9jV+UAxXDSEtosBWx4uqTDF+mu5ErxuXJ9PqIsCEL0IIImDkDKZPQ7MqRMhlIxxiS 6tHKoOQ89xjQFCu0+b/ZF0r6N+qQBe0PcmMp3S8oB6JSrQVrh8CWzKbTYJ2zw+Ukc47e Aq1IYTl7gflWwAMyJqj1wTFpq1NfTgM1Ngpl0/DHChNnqbxDQGcafKbAIdzBTh8/XHTM bJ4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v25-20020a17090606d900b0093175b7c1e3si1372478ejb.870.2023.04.13.02.17.21; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229717AbjDMJPT (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Apr 2023 05:15:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39272 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230160AbjDMJPL (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2023 05:15:11 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D149E93F4 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEF2D75; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pierre123.nice.arm.com (pierre123.nice.arm.com [10.34.100.129]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E46F13F6C4; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 02:15:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Pierre Gondois To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Radu Rendec , Alexandre Ghiti , Conor Dooley , Will Deacon , Pierre Gondois , Sudeep Holla , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Palmer Dabbelt , Gavin Shan Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] cacheinfo: Check cache properties are present in DT Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:14:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20230413091436.230134-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20230413091436.230134-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com> References: <20230413091436.230134-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If a Device Tree (DT) is used, the presence of cache properties is assumed. Not finding any is not considered. For arm64 platforms, cache information can be fetched from the clidr_el1 register. Checking whether cache information is available in the DT allows to switch to using clidr_el1. init_of_cache_level() \-of_count_cache_leaves() will assume there a 2 cache leaves (L1 data/instruction caches), which can be different from clidr_el1 information. cache_setup_of_node() tries to read cache properties in the DT. If there are none, this is considered a success. Knowing no information was available would allow to switch to using clidr_el1. Fixes: de0df442ee49 ("cacheinfo: Check 'cache-unified' property to count cache leaves") Reported-by: Alexandre Ghiti Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230404-hatred-swimmer-6fecdf33b57a@spud/ Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois --- drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c index c5d2293ac2a6..06de9a468958 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ bool last_level_cache_is_shared(unsigned int cpu_x, unsigned int cpu_y) } #ifdef CONFIG_OF + +static bool of_check_cache_nodes(struct device_node *np); + /* OF properties to query for a given cache type */ struct cache_type_info { const char *size_prop; @@ -205,6 +208,11 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu) return -ENOENT; } + if (!of_check_cache_nodes(np)) { + of_node_put(np); + return -ENOENT; + } + prev = np; while (index < cache_leaves(cpu)) { @@ -229,6 +237,25 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu) return 0; } +static bool of_check_cache_nodes(struct device_node *np) +{ + struct device_node *next; + + if (of_property_present(np, "cache-size") || + of_property_present(np, "i-cache-size") || + of_property_present(np, "d-cache-size") || + of_property_present(np, "cache-unified")) + return true; + + next = of_find_next_cache_node(np); + if (next) { + of_node_put(next); + return true; + } + + return false; +} + static int of_count_cache_leaves(struct device_node *np) { unsigned int leaves = 0; @@ -260,6 +287,9 @@ int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) struct device_node *prev = NULL; unsigned int levels = 0, leaves, level; + if (!of_check_cache_nodes(np)) + goto err_out; + leaves = of_count_cache_leaves(np); if (leaves > 0) levels = 1; -- 2.25.1