Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:35:43 +0200
From:   Andrea Claudi <aclaudi@redhat.com>
To:     abhijeet.1989@gmail.com
Cc:     Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>, Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipvs: change ip_vs_conn_tab_bits range to [8,31]
Message-ID: <ZDfa/wuJTp8vk+wI@renaissance-vector>
References: <20230412-increase_ipvs_conn_tab_bits-v1-1-60a4f9f4c8f2@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230412-increase_ipvs_conn_tab_bits-v1-1-60a4f9f4c8f2@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:49:08PM -0700, Abhijeet Rastogi via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Abhijeet Rastogi <abhijeet.1989@gmail.com>
> 
> Current range [8, 20] is set purely due to historical reasons
> because at the time, ~1M (2^20) was considered sufficient.
> 
> Previous change regarding this limit is here.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/86eabeb9dd62aebf1e2533926fdd13fed48bab1f.1631289960.git.aclaudi@redhat.com/T/#u
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Rastogi <abhijeet.1989@gmail.com>
> ---
> The conversation for this started at: 
> 
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter/msg60995.html
> 
> The upper limit for algo is any bit size less than 32, so this
> change will allow us to set bit size > 20. Today, it is common to have
> RAM available to handle greater than 2^20 connections per-host.
> 
> Distros like RHEL already have higher limits set.

Hi Abhijeet,
for the record, RHEL ships with CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS set to 12 as
default.

> ---
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig      | 4 ++--
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig b/net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig
> index 271da8447b29..3e3371f8c0f9 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/Kconfig
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ config	IP_VS_DEBUG
>  
>  config	IP_VS_TAB_BITS
>  	int "IPVS connection table size (the Nth power of 2)"
> -	range 8 20
> +	range 8 31
>  	default 12
>  	help
>  	  The IPVS connection hash table uses the chaining scheme to handle
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ config	IP_VS_TAB_BITS
>  
>  	  Note the table size must be power of 2. The table size will be the
>  	  value of 2 to the your input number power. The number to choose is
> -	  from 8 to 20, the default number is 12, which means the table size
> +	  from 8 to 31, the default number is 12, which means the table size
>  	  is 4096. Don't input the number too small, otherwise you will lose
>  	  performance on it. You can adapt the table size yourself, according
>  	  to your virtual server application. It is good to set the table size
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> index 13534e02346c..bc0fe1a698d4 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c
> @@ -1484,8 +1484,8 @@ int __init ip_vs_conn_init(void)
>  	int idx;
>  
>  	/* Compute size and mask */
> -	if (ip_vs_conn_tab_bits < 8 || ip_vs_conn_tab_bits > 20) {
> -		pr_info("conn_tab_bits not in [8, 20]. Using default value\n");
> +	if (ip_vs_conn_tab_bits < 8 || ip_vs_conn_tab_bits > 31) {
> +		pr_info("conn_tab_bits not in [8, 31]. Using default value\n");
>  		ip_vs_conn_tab_bits = CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS;
>  	}
>  	ip_vs_conn_tab_size = 1 << ip_vs_conn_tab_bits;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 09a9639e56c01c7a00d6c0ca63f4c7c41abe075d
> change-id: 20230412-increase_ipvs_conn_tab_bits-4322c90da216
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Abhijeet Rastogi <abhijeet.1989@gmail.com>
>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Andrea Claudi <aclaudi@redhat.com>