Received: by 2002:a05:6358:11c7:b0:104:8066:f915 with SMTP id i7csp2506612rwl; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:21:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Y62L9LWstqkPu5cE9pCwHevd5DdczHETX/jqKARsXVdvy5V6s5ac+Cwf0mvCCEFBq20c5A X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:32ce:b0:94e:8e40:3473 with SMTP id k14-20020a17090632ce00b0094e8e403473mr2735665ejk.40.1681395679631; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:21:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681395679; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zvnhWvKrZnZz/qFSPzY3SKw/Q+CLUvHyngQ1UpKv2DrtGjs4UJq3IwqmEctLJwFyH7 X/95l7sfm2YJBajqNZcr+DdNT3QlSlYC1U7WTaRcUwOZJdXNrTQ07W+iyYji9gYph+tl thbvmKAfLmnYck6itP4NnTyaJVXTGQKZVQhVWDuiljn9zNQhqTVfC9MtK0HLwosQQrEN xhDjGuYi21Ol7iTI+8FxkcW53iajpSTbNgo70Kom0ifbTtgydf2V8ap45TppRgSJCrRq wE8kicNuTBgbGmZJjowu7gROqvhL0+kdAamx9UW5d0QNrH3VJAp3kV0yzqySd+sZ0l8s pqBQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=zVZLnS1EpbXZplSa6VV3xfGtTLtoH3BSWk8A4KkMbCA=; b=urpYdIfYOF0aANWQGI+qrvGyF/7HOPJcsX14GsaI1gz49H98V1dc+bRK9YbFqRSqda Wl1K6AYsFq7UuX56VNWYX1AtVJuZMd4ln4k/0hy3piW6w1YarfS1iJKxpmVPOEp7U5m2 Bd/X1wjN9nGZWjNF7jisYGDbPuAE5In+2WN/j52P+VWpuj2guwQutpe7UVHTkwTxeswp QiIykmz1Qubt+cM91NiQSZkp6bWeTdEECoZnnsLXjskc4LO5+ipJ1Z91OQ0+TQAl8lrv B4B8GncbObLfuHxMPrWB6bfOcX8UQov7BIjNWsHCvZtlxtmjIomS/+OF6bXk+lpUloo7 BSzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="YBhbY/3v"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=6kT95Xok; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fd15-20020a1709072a0f00b0094cea0b33besi1737099ejc.75.2023.04.13.07.20.53; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:21:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="YBhbY/3v"; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=6kT95Xok; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229888AbjDMOTO (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:19:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50542 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229656AbjDMOTN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:19:13 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1382D43 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64E61FD63; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:19:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1681395550; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zVZLnS1EpbXZplSa6VV3xfGtTLtoH3BSWk8A4KkMbCA=; b=YBhbY/3vFNXi8j8bU1pNbYOhFS8prEw9r4a+SZAsPY3dcbCSIkOfIqz3VNWZmJVdawjoJj PnlRM+blX4/efBHAtwHqSygLYYEjw2h8fxAEOfKs1Hu53XuF5QIkV8ZMxz1X58O+G/fGBw nSwoiyS6Uww9QZmlV/00ce/9dzLXKnY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1681395550; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zVZLnS1EpbXZplSa6VV3xfGtTLtoH3BSWk8A4KkMbCA=; b=6kT95XokIuxAoLmmRLAXb0rO/iGLYr+iDmPDYC1ER9a9dPMI/WJ+5jHmAbHQJpf3vEawLS JKoClyrxbYdSovCg== Received: from pobox.suse.cz (pobox.suse.cz [10.100.2.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC302C143; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 16:19:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Miroslav Benes To: Josh Poimboeuf cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] objtool: Detect missing __noreturn annotations In-Reply-To: <0f630a0eb4585ab4114e4eecaa6f166a1fd81d49.1681325924.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <0f630a0eb4585ab4114e4eecaa6f166a1fd81d49.1681325924.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- a/tools/objtool/check.c > +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c > @@ -4485,7 +4485,8 @@ static int validate_sls(struct objtool_file *file) > > static int validate_reachable_instructions(struct objtool_file *file) > { > - struct instruction *insn; > + struct instruction *insn, *prev_insn; > + struct symbol *call_dest; > int warnings = 0; > > if (file->ignore_unreachables) > @@ -4495,6 +4496,17 @@ static int validate_reachable_instructions(struct objtool_file *file) > if (insn->visited || ignore_unreachable_insn(file, insn)) > continue; > > + prev_insn = prev_insn_same_sec(file, insn); > + if (prev_insn && prev_insn->dead_end) { > + call_dest = insn_call_dest(prev_insn); > + if (call_dest) { > + WARN_INSN(insn, "%s() is missing a __noreturn annotation", > + call_dest->name); > + warnings++; > + continue; A nit but this and > + } > + } > + > WARN_INSN(insn, "unreachable instruction"); > warnings++; this makes me thinking. Wouldn't it be confusing to anyone that there is no correspondence between warnings and a number of actual reported warnings through WARN_INSN()? In the future when there would be a usage for warnings. It does not really matter now. Miroslav