Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:25:10 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Jan =?UTF-8?B?S3VuZHLDoXQ=?= <jkt@gentoo.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
Message-ID: <20070926112510.314e8775@cuia.boston.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <46FA09E8.7010101@gentoo.org>
References: <46F852B6.7030207@gentoo.org>
	<20070924223444.62f0622d@bree.surriel.com>
	<46F8DF55.2030905@gentoo.org>
	<20070925213156.68fceea2@bree.surriel.com>
	<46FA09E8.7010101@gentoo.org>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 919
Lines: 27

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:27:36 +0200
Jan Kundrát <jkt@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Could you try out the attached patch, too?
> 
> Sorry, I wasn't able to apply it against 2.6.22-gentoo-r3 and vanilla
> 2.6.22.7; I don't have the "order" member in the "struct scan_control"
> and also the bit about "if (sync_writeback == PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC &&
> may_enter_fs)" was missing so there was no "else" branch to add (and
> it seemd pretty significant to me). What version should I patch
> against?

Sorry, the patch is against 2.6.23-rc7.

> When this is sorted out, should I keep the previous patch [1] applied
> as well?

That doesn't hurt.

-- 
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/