Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760480AbXIZS6M (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:58:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755138AbXIZS56 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:57:58 -0400 Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:55987 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756629AbXIZS56 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:57:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:57:57 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Matthew Wilcox Subject: dmapool Message-ID: <20070926185757.GM3899@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1101 Lines: 25 I have a series of patches to dmapool that I'd like opinions on. I don't have any performance numbers yet, but some of the patches are a good idea, with or without performance numbers. One of the problems with dmapool is that it doesn't have a maintainer listed. I've spent enough time looking at it over the past couple of weeks that I think I'd be comfortable in that role, so unless someone objects, I'll submit a patch to MAINTAINERS to add myself. I shan't post the first two patches. The first simply Lindents the code and the second moves it to mm/ (a better fit than drivers/base, IMO). Four patches to follow. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/