Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:54:12 +0200
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     pavel@ucw.cz, lee@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver
Message-ID: <20230414175412.37a15572@aktux>
In-Reply-To: <f9da7499-3fb3-1ce6-db0b-d87febee2052@linaro.org>
References: <20230414055341.335456-1-andreas@kemnade.info>
        <20230414055341.335456-2-andreas@kemnade.info>
        <f9da7499-3fb3-1ce6-db0b-d87febee2052@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:28:49 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 14/04/2023 07:53, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Document ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver devicetree bindings.  
> 
> Subject: no improvements and no comments from your side. Why?
> 
old subject (v2):

dt-bindings: leds: ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver

Your comment:
Subject: maybe drop "driver" (suggests it is for Linux drivers, although
maybe it matches the actual hardware here?) and add missing verb, e.g.
"Add ROHM ..."

New Subject (v3/4):
dt-bindings: leds: Add ROHM BD2606MVV LED driver

What is still missing?

Regards,
Andreas