Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 15 Apr 2023 17:55:20 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Marius Hoch <mail@mariushoch.de>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: st_sensors: Add ACPI support for lsm303d to
 the LSM9DS0 IMU driver
Message-ID: <20230415175520.65adfc60@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20230413024013.450165-5-mail@mariushoch.de>
References: <20230413024013.450165-1-mail@mariushoch.de>
        <20230413024013.450165-5-mail@mariushoch.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 04:40:11 +0200
Marius Hoch <mail@mariushoch.de> wrote:

> The lsm303d can be found as ACCL0001 on various Lenovo devices,
> including the Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 1051-F, where I tested this
> patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marius Hoch <mail@mariushoch.de>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c
> index 64fa77d302e2..79be8d28d965 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_i2c.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/iio/common/st_sensors_i2c.h>
>  
> @@ -37,6 +38,14 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id st_lsm9ds0_id_table[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, st_lsm9ds0_id_table);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static const struct acpi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match[] = {
> +	{"ACCL0001", (kernel_ulong_t)LSM303D_IMU_DEV_NAME},
> +	{ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match);
> +#endif

The table is tiny so I'd prefer dropping the complexity of ifdefs
and getting rid of the ACPI_PTR() below. Just assign the pointer
unconditionally.

Rest of the series looks good to me

Thanks,

Jonathan

> +
>  static const struct regmap_config st_lsm9ds0_regmap_config = {
>  	.reg_bits	= 8,
>  	.val_bits	= 8,
> @@ -73,6 +82,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver st_lsm9ds0_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "st-lsm9ds0-i2c",
>  		.of_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_of_match,
> +		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match),
>  	},
>  	.probe_new = st_lsm9ds0_i2c_probe,
>  	.id_table = st_lsm9ds0_id_table,
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> index 997b5ff792be..27c5d99ce0e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm9ds0/st_lsm9ds0_spi.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/iio/common/st_sensors_spi.h>
>  
> @@ -37,6 +38,14 @@ static const struct spi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_id_table[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, st_lsm9ds0_id_table);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static const struct acpi_device_id st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match[] = {
> +	{"ACCL0001", (kernel_ulong_t)LSM303D_IMU_DEV_NAME},
> +	{ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match);
> +#endif
> +
>  static const struct regmap_config st_lsm9ds0_regmap_config = {
>  	.reg_bits	= 8,
>  	.val_bits	= 8,
> @@ -72,6 +81,7 @@ static struct spi_driver st_lsm9ds0_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "st-lsm9ds0-spi",
>  		.of_match_table = st_lsm9ds0_of_match,
> +		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(st_lsm9ds0_acpi_match),
>  	},
>  	.probe = st_lsm9ds0_spi_probe,
>  	.id_table = st_lsm9ds0_id_table,