Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Saalim Quadri <danascape@gmail.com>
To:     krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Cc:     alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org,
        danascape@gmail.com, daniel.baluta@nxp.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        patches@opensource.cirrus.com, robh+dt@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: wm8753: Convert to dtschema
Date:   Sat, 15 Apr 2023 20:12:46 +0000
Message-Id: <20230415201246.1200683-1-danascape@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5d629ff3-c5ae-bd00-e70d-8c0d58365ce3@linaro.org>
References: <5d629ff3-c5ae-bd00-e70d-8c0d58365ce3@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

> You choose unusual bindings to convert to DT schema. It is fine but
> honestly, less useful, with limited impact. This is an old, 12 year old
> binding without users. Maybe it would be even removed by now...
> I suggest converting ones which have a real impact - have users in DTS.
> Otherwise you will be putting quite a lot of effort for no real gains...
> because what is the difference between this binding being TXT and DT schema?

I am converting these bindings as part of my GSoC project where I need to convert
as many files as possible during the given tenure, I am slowly trying to read files
in other subsystems too and will push patches for other subsystems too.
Is it fine?

About the part where you suggested to convert the txt into a single YAML, shall I
continue working on them? As I can see Mark merged the previous 2 patches to linux-next

Kind Regards,

Saalim