Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sun, 16 Apr 2023 15:37:04 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
        Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= <noname.nuno@gmail.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
        Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
        Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Enable write support
Message-ID: <20230416153704.35f5ff4d@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <20230403154800.215924-7-paul@crapouillou.net>
References: <20230403154800.215924-1-paul@crapouillou.net>
        <20230403154800.215924-7-paul@crapouillou.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon,  3 Apr 2023 17:47:55 +0200
Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> wrote:

> Use the iio_dma_buffer_write() and iio_dma_buffer_space_available()
> functions provided by the buffer-dma core, to enable write support in
> the buffer-dmaengine code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> index 592d2aa9044c..866c8b84bb24 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> @@ -123,12 +123,14 @@ static void iio_dmaengine_buffer_release(struct iio_buffer *buf)
>  
>  static const struct iio_buffer_access_funcs iio_dmaengine_buffer_ops = {
>  	.read = iio_dma_buffer_read,
> +	.write = iio_dma_buffer_write,
>  	.set_bytes_per_datum = iio_dma_buffer_set_bytes_per_datum,
>  	.set_length = iio_dma_buffer_set_length,
>  	.request_update = iio_dma_buffer_request_update,
>  	.enable = iio_dma_buffer_enable,
>  	.disable = iio_dma_buffer_disable,
>  	.data_available = iio_dma_buffer_data_available,
> +	.space_available = iio_dma_buffer_space_available,
Follow through from earlier patch.  I would prefer it to be obvious
hers that the two callbacks above are identical.  Easiest way to
expose that detail is to set the callbacks to the same function, but then
it perhaps needs a rename so it isn't specific to one of the other.

Jonathan

>  	.release = iio_dmaengine_buffer_release,
>  
>  	.modes = INDIO_BUFFER_HARDWARE,