Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <73d0178c3b9608fae207c9f135aa1f807cb56e47.camel@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: make drm_dp_add_payload_part2 gracefully handle
 NULL state pointer
From:   Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
        "Lin, Wayne" <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 07:02:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87leiqer8g.fsf@intel.com>
References: <20230413111254.22458-1-jlayton@kernel.org>
         <87edooarpq.fsf@intel.com>
         <CADnq5_PVnYMSiKO77+cfg_V-tDKYkVJYN3qGNb1vhQO3QtXskA@mail.gmail.com>
         <CO6PR12MB5489044012B2A96639470F38FC999@CO6PR12MB5489.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
         <4d8479f20ef30866fcf73f3602f1237376110764.camel@kernel.org>
         <878reug394.fsf@intel.com>
         <7a1b00f02b125bd65824b18ea09509efe3cf777d.camel@redhat.com>
         <874jpegao0.fsf@intel.com>
         <b99732f7c0dd968c0702ae7629695e8fb9cb573f.camel@kernel.org>
         <87leiqer8g.fsf@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 13:29 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2023, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 11:44 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2023, Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2023-04-14 at 13:35 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2023, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 2023-04-14 at 04:40 +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote:
> > > > > > > [Public]
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > Hi Jeff,
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > Thanks. I might need more information to understand why we ca=
n't retrieve
> > > > > > > the drm atomic state. Also , "Failed to create MST payload fo=
r port" indicates
> > > > > > > error while configuring DPCD payload ID table. Could you help=
 to provide log
> > > > > > > with KMS + ATOMIC + DP debug on please? Thanks in advance!
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Wayne
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > Possibly. I'm not that familiar with display driver debugging. =
Can you
> > > > > > send me some directions on how to crank up that sort of debug l=
ogging?
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > Note that this problem is _very_ intermittent too: I went about=
 2 weeks
> > > > > > between crashes, and then I got 3 in one day. I'd rather not ru=
n with a
> > > > > > lot of debug logging for a long time if that's what this is goi=
ng to
> > > > > > require, as this is my main workstation.
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > The last time I got this log message, my proposed patch did pre=
vent the
> > > > > > box from oopsing, so I'd really like to see it go in unless it'=
s just
> > > > > > categorically wrong for the caller to pass down a NULL state po=
inter to
> > > > > > drm_dp_add_payload_part2.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Cc: Lyude.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Looks like the state parameter was added in commit 4d07b0bc4034
> > > > > ("drm/display/dp_mst: Move all payload info into the atomic state=
") and
> > > > > its only use is to get at state->dev for debug logging.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > What's the plan for the parameter? Surely something more than tha=
t! :)
> > > >=20
> > > > I don't think there was any plan for that, or at least I certainly =
don't even
> > > > remember adding that D:. It must totally have been by mistake and s=
nuck by
> > > > review, if that's the only thing that we're using it for I'd say it=
's
> > > > definitely fine to just drop it entirely
> > >=20
> > > I guess we could use two patches then, first replace state->dev with
> > > mgr->dev as something that can be backported as needed, and second dr=
op
> > > the state parameter altogether.
> > >=20
> > > Jeff, up for it? At least the first one?
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > BR,
> > > Jani.
> > >=20
> >=20
> > Sure. I'm happy to test patches if you send them along.
>=20
> I was hoping to lure you into sending patches. ;)
>=20
> Anyway, I'm not working on this.
>=20
>=20

Ok. I misunderstood, I'll change the patch I've been using to use mgr-
>dev instead and will send along a v2 here in a few days (after some
testing).
--=20
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>