Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:41:30 +0200
From:   Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
        Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
        kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: Add partial ACL
 support for ksz9477 switches
Message-ID: <20230417114130.GB11474@pengutronix.de>
References: <20230411172456.3003003-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <20230411172456.3003003-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <20230413042936.GA12562@pengutronix.de>
 <20230416165904.2y7zwgyxwltjzj7m@skbuf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20230416165904.2y7zwgyxwltjzj7m@skbuf>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:59:04PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 06:29:36AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > According to KSZ9477S 5.2.8.2 Port Priority Control Register
> > "To achieve the desired functionality, do not set more than one bit at a
> > time in this register.
> > ...
> > Bit 6 - OR’ed Priority
> > ...
> > Bit 2 - 802.1p Priority Classification
> > Bit 1 - Diffserv Priority Classification
> > Bit 0 - ACL Priority Classification
> > "
> > @Arun  what will happen if multiple engines are used for packet
> > prioritization? For example ACL || Diffserv || 802.1p... ?
> > If I see it correctly, it is possible but not recommended. Should I
> > prevent usage of multiple prio sources? 
> 
> You could try and find out which one takes priority... we support VLAN
> PCP and DSCP prioritization through the dcbnl application priority table.

According to my tests, ACL has higher priority compared to 802.1p module.

dcbnl is a new word for me, will need to understand if first :)
What is the best example to use it with DSCP?

Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |