Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756164AbXI0OKS (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:10:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756030AbXI0OJq (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:09:46 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:36785 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755903AbXI0OJo (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:09:44 -0400 Message-Id: <20070927141200.820970144@X40.localnet> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-62.1 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:12:00 +0200 From: jblunck@suse.de To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hch@lst.de, agruen@suse.de, tiwai@suse.de Subject: [patch 00/10] Use struct path in struct nameidata Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 597 Lines: 16 This is a respin of the patch series Andreas posted last month. It leaves out the restructuring of the intent which will be done at a later point in time. There are three preparing patches that remove unneeded code IMHO. I haven't got feedback from Takashi since he is on holiday. Please, can somebody else acknowledge the changes? Comments? Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/