Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758785AbXI0RUA (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:20:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757300AbXI0RTx (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:19:53 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33250 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753797AbXI0RTw (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:19:52 -0400 Cc: hch@lst.de, geoff@gclare.org.uk, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:19:50 +0200 From: "Michael Kerrisk" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20070927171950.252220@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46FB9FB9.8080201@gmx.net> Subject: Re: Revised signalfd man-page To: Davide Libenzi X-Authenticated: #24879014 X-Flags: 0001 X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange) X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+LVJ9SDZSLPH/ftV1u0gXbrOjZ4X8kip1uN9sPHs HyC0Tk1HNEQzGxuiDN/pXT2t2bWwtxAhOc7A== Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-GMX-UID: AtTMce8bbGInb9/pFmVnJc1vcmZ1ZtyP Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1704 Lines: 51 > Von: Davide Libenzi > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote: [...] > > .\" FIXME Davide, what does the following mean? How (in userspace > > .\" terms) does a sighand structure become orphaned? > > The > > .BR read (2) > > call can also return 0, > > in case the sighand structure to which the signalfd was attached, > > has been orphaned. > > You can remove the five lines above, in virtue of the fact that Linus > merged my simplification patch. Okay. [...] > > .\" FIXME Davide, a question: why rename these fields to be > > .\" different from their siginfo_t counterparts? At the very least, > > .\" it would have been nicer to use the same names with prefixes > > .\" such as (say) "fdsi_" (thus, e.g., fdsi_signo); that would have > > .\" made grepping both kernel and userland source code easier > > .\" (e.g, to find instances of "si_signo" in a siginfo_t or a > > .\" signalfd_siginfo structure), and also would have avoided > > .\" weirdnesses like trimming "errno" down to err. > > .\" > > That is fine for me. I'd like ssi_* (for Signalfd SigInfo). Ok? Yes, equally good. Would you write a patch for this, and CC me please? Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages , read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/