Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc:     Victor Hassan <victor@allwinnertech.com>, fweisbec@gmail.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, jindong.yue@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tick/broadcast: Do not set oneshot_mask except
 was_periodic was true
In-Reply-To: <87mt354lr5.ffs@tglx>
References: <20230412003425.11323-1-victor@allwinnertech.com>
 <87sfd0yi4g.ffs@tglx> <ZD1fdvr1Eh8aAdnU@localhost.localdomain>
 <87mt354lr5.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:09:32 +0200
Message-ID: <87jzy94kvn.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 18 2023 at 10:50, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 17 2023 at 17:02, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> Le Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 11:01:51PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner a =C3=A9crit :
>>> There is a second problem with broadcast device replacement in this
>>> function. The broadcast device is only armed when the previous state of
>>> the device was periodic.
>>
>> Any chance the patch could be cut in two then?
>
> Let me try.

Not really as fixing that part depends on fixing the original issue and
once the original issue is fixed the issue for the replacement case is
more or less automatically there.

Thanks,

        tglx