Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:02:12 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc:     Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: fix build issue with binutils before
 2.28
Message-ID: <20230418100212.GBZD5qpFuxKaz3WtAC@fat_crate.local>
References: <20230418064228.21577-1-w@1wt.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230418064228.21577-1-w@1wt.eu>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:42:28AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Boris, I understood from your message that 2.28 was the first working version,
> so that's what I mentioned here. My tests showed that 2.27 wasn't sufficient
> and that 2.29 was OK.

No, you have it right above:

U suffix - 2.27
L/LL suffixes - 2.28

I was wondering where to put that info for future reference but didn't
find a good place so I extended your commit message with it. Now at
least we have left bread crumbs in case we need it in the future.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette