Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <ae487706-1081-bab3-0b31-1c5b3a72890e@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:19:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Remove unnecessary blank
 lines
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Patrick DELAUNAY <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
References: <20230417181342.v2.1.I483a676579cc7e3ac07e1db649091553743fecc8@changeid>
 <fde49fb8-c337-3a6b-811e-b9d7c3620393@linaro.org>
 <f2ad2414-526e-8b9b-aa95-a35953556f36@foss.st.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <f2ad2414-526e-8b9b-aa95-a35953556f36@foss.st.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 18/04/2023 15:03, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 4/18/23 09:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/04/2023 18:14, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
>>> Remove double blank line.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - update commit title and commit message to reflect what the change is
>>>    V1="dt-bindings: mfd: stm32: Fix STM32F4 DT include fil
>> More than one file has the same issue. This is quite a churn to handle
>> such patch one by one. Please fix all of them or just skip, as it is
>> harmless.
> 
> 
> To be crystal clear, it is minor difference between files in U-Boot
> 
> and in Linux, just because we correct the check-patch errors
> 
> when this file for STM32F4 was up streamed in U-Boot.
> 
> 
> I prefer correct this line in the Linux file and no having
> 
> this difference for each device tree synchronization with U-Boot.

I don't know what is there in U-Boot, so my comment was not about it. I
prefer all the files in Linux kernel being correct, but done once for
all. Not once for stm32XX, then later for stm32XY and then stm32XZ...

Best regards,
Krzysztof