Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp32054rwr; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 03:01:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZRGrT0/pcwBIuRxM8sUGQr0E65tsyWaMQU0YVN88npjonTki68uBiezEfhlj6VXStx6QUF X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3ca8:b0:ee:d266:32bb with SMTP id b40-20020a056a203ca800b000eed26632bbmr3439861pzj.7.1681898487959; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 03:01:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681898487; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MkRPaJF3Q49Oi/aWdQr9meY++X9M+eXKQdIjVhxZnl1b9abJEyBu0B8vJP3j6FZPUS qG1fh8bo0kqon6t4P8sIbGkLvPYdNyro+uwcH+iBk4GSQslLfo+00DnmBKESqpSeD5EM GekH1J478h5Gk8HPhnjox6Co7ousGPDc/cHaJJZ2ZPMe6CtfExeqjQ8OnnKyl0W2evVm 8Faj86la9/gLJKQ+pP9m+O5HeHa3EhWBi0hgWIE0CvjJRFzxzi/LuhjO2cqhjhXMTngz KT/S0kh+MlatyK6AtRk161Q1hsoXw8JEwZOy8BDE/Vy55VGmjWoZ15FIR48xJ8ZzRwAa 66vw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=Sq106CTCnNBMSXjghG83j1zRLVvJVODgmlQUGHxNGLg=; b=VHdGFPku7/vpSkJfxDFrcjgsLsKz2oWkBPaB1NwLUGdIyCNCQyZF6eZSA6yctnuUnl 96gUlBVRq6k9o77CMiwP5+vOKpCwsgQ081UH1PjrNbS9iEdJZfEy7SeQUyr81zmDmzjE DuC6tGIjbhRvh9Hy4KaotzA0qteClSxtVGYDPtbwMtHSmlJFK6seEb5k4j68wOgEOhZ3 7dpKS2IBAOOtKYMoLMWUO8HS/tvbMnQVtDmrJp0fpbeEN1eNy4hj6wJtGJxpaAsgSkJu lEgtDB4DbzXJ0PkXXlZmsXyZdf6Zm/XUgPLTU8NB1rrWOueGbx+oKBcS2muhMUZUHjMR NbdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 11-20020a63000b000000b0051820b42b57si16700604pga.619.2023.04.19.03.01.15; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 03:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232173AbjDSJxU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 05:53:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47936 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231783AbjDSJxS (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2023 05:53:18 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5062DE7 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 02:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81B01063; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 02:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.20.93] (unknown [10.57.20.93]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C10963F6C4; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 02:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 10:53:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/scheduler: set entity to NULL in drm_sched_entity_pop_job() Content-Language: en-GB To: Lucas Stach , Danilo Krummrich , luben.tuikov@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20230418100453.4433-1-dakr@redhat.com> <04f039ac71f3c0685a849b492478d18ec6ea4d11.camel@pengutronix.de> From: Steven Price In-Reply-To: <04f039ac71f3c0685a849b492478d18ec6ea4d11.camel@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/04/2023 10:44, Lucas Stach wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Am Mittwoch, dem 19.04.2023 um 10:39 +0100 schrieb Steven Price: >> On 18/04/2023 11:04, Danilo Krummrich wrote: >>> It already happend a few times that patches slipped through which >>> implemented access to an entity through a job that was already removed >>> from the entities queue. Since jobs and entities might have different >>> lifecycles, this can potentially cause UAF bugs. >>> >>> In order to make it obvious that a jobs entity pointer shouldn't be >>> accessed after drm_sched_entity_pop_job() was called successfully, set >>> the jobs entity pointer to NULL once the job is removed from the entity >>> queue. >>> >>> Moreover, debugging a potential NULL pointer dereference is way easier >>> than potentially corrupted memory through a UAF. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich >> >> This triggers a splat for me (with Panfrost driver), the cause of which >> is the following code in drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(): >> >> if (job) { >> job->entity->elapsed_ns += ktime_to_ns( >> ktime_sub(job->s_fence->finished.timestamp, >> job->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp)); >> } >> >> which indeed is accessing entity after the job has been returned from >> drm_sched_entity_pop_job(). And obviously job->entity is a NULL pointer >> with this patch. >> >> I'm afraid I don't fully understand the lifecycle so I'm not sure if >> this is simply exposing an existing bug in drm_sched_get_cleanup_job() >> or if this commit needs to be reverted. >> > Not sure which tree you are on. The offending commit has been reverted > in 6.3-rc5. This is in drm-misc-next - I'm not sure which "offending commit" you are referring to. I'm referring to: 96c7c2f4d5bd ("drm/scheduler: set entity to NULL in drm_sched_entity_pop_job()") which was merged yesterday to drm-misc-next (and is currently the top commit). Is there another commit which has been reverted elsewhere which is conflicting? Steve > Regards, > Lucas > >> Thanks, >> >> Steve >> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 6 ++++++ >>> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 4 ++++ >>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c >>> index 15d04a0ec623..a9c6118e534b 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c >>> @@ -448,6 +448,12 @@ struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity) >>> drm_sched_rq_update_fifo(entity, next->submit_ts); >>> } >>> >>> + /* Jobs and entities might have different lifecycles. Since we're >>> + * removing the job from the entities queue, set the jobs entity pointer >>> + * to NULL to prevent any future access of the entity through this job. >>> + */ >>> + sched_job->entity = NULL; >>> + >>> return sched_job; >>> } >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c >>> index 9b16480686f6..e89a3e469cd5 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c >>> @@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ >>> * the hardware. >>> * >>> * The jobs in a entity are always scheduled in the order that they were pushed. >>> + * >>> + * Note that once a job was taken from the entities queue and pushed to the >>> + * hardware, i.e. the pending queue, the entity must not be referenced anymore >>> + * through the jobs entity pointer. >>> */ >>> >>> #include >> >