Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758725AbXI1IyO (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:54:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753683AbXI1IyA (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:54:00 -0400 Received: from hellhawk.shadowen.org ([80.68.90.175]:3813 "EHLO hellhawk.shadowen.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754675AbXI1Ix7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:53:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:53:47 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Andrew Morton Cc: Thomas Gleixner , roel <12o3l@tiscali.nl>, lkml , Randy Dunlap , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] spin_lock_unlocked cleanups Message-ID: <20070928085347.GB12086@shadowen.org> References: <46FC2245.50907@tiscali.nl> <1190967450.18681.10.camel@chaos> <20070928012656.0bae3991.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070928012656.0bae3991.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SPF-Guess: neutral Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1437 Lines: 36 On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:26:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:17:30 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > can we please add this to checkpatch.pl ? > > > > > -spinlock_t bpci_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; > > > +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bpci_lock); > > That check is already in checkpatch. Problem is that hardly anyone > runs the thing. > > I think we're ready to wire checkpatch up to a email robot which monitors > the mailing lists and sends people nastygrams. I bet that'll be popular ;) That shouldn't be too hard. checkpatch has been subscribed since birth but short circuiting the replies to me only. I guess the main question is whether to reply-all or reply just to the sender when commenting on patches. Perhaps for the sanity of the rest of the world, just the sender makes most sense. > (I'd love it if it could detect wordwrapped and tab-expanded patches, too. > You wouldn't _believe_...) It should pick up both of these, the word-wrapping is already there as we detect lines within patch segments which don't start '[ +-]', the tab-expanded should be picked up as every line would be "don't use spaces use tabs for indent". -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/