Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAE-0n50atfmr-bFh5XtTCm4WpSijJGSe0B5JP8ni7CCYk7Bs5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20230331091145.737305-1-treapking@chromium.org>
 <20230331091145.737305-5-treapking@chromium.org> <CAE-0n51E5foFWQAsA73662_5e6XP426wuUCVVmcS5UWwiYpDmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEXTbpdcbB_z4ZGCGzc-cM74ECKyxekbroKCWFnhH8eR=4HmvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAE-0n50atfmr-bFh5XtTCm4WpSijJGSe0B5JP8ni7CCYk7Bs5A@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
User-Agent: alot/0.10
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 23:10:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE-0n51Qy-KDGHOCr4Smpebq1fCURqvJ2RJz6KAtVpv5e+DSGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 04/10] dt-bindings: display: bridge: anx7625: Add
 mode-switch support
To:     Pin-yen Lin <treapking@chromium.org>
Cc:     Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
        Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Xin Ji <xji@analogixsemi.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
        =?UTF-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRiAuIFIgLiBBIC4gUHJhZG8=?= 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Stephen Boyd (2023-04-13 17:22:46)
> Quoting Pin-yen Lin (2023-04-13 02:50:44)
> >
> > Actually the `mode-switch` property here is mainly because
> > `fwnode_typec_mux_get`[1] and `typec_mux_match`[2] only return matches
> > when the property is present. I am not sure what side effects would be
> > if I remove the ID-matching condition in `typec_mux_match`, so I added
> > the property here.
> >
> > Is it feasible to remove the `mode-switch` property here given the
> > existing implementation of the Type-C framework?
>
> Omitting the mode-switch property would require changes to the type-c
> framework.
>
> I'm wondering if we can have this anx driver register mode switches for
> however many endpoints exist in the output port all the time when the
> aux-bus node doesn't exist. Then the type-c framework can walk from the
> usb-c-connector to each connected node looking for a device that is both
> a drm_bridge and a mode-switch. When it finds that combination, it knows
> that the mode-switch has been found. This hinges on the idea that a
> device that would have the mode-switch property is a drm_bridge and
> would register a mode-switch with the type-c framework.
>
> It may be a little complicated though, because we would only register
> one drm_bridge for the input to this anx device. The type-c walking code
> would need to look at the graph endpoint, and find the parent device to
> see if it is a drm_bridge.

I've been thinking more about this. I think we should only have the
'mode-switch' property possible when the USB input pins (port@2) are
connected and the DPI input pins are connected (port@0). Probably you
don't have that case though?

In your case, this device should register either one or two drm_bridges
that connect to whatever downstream is actually muxing the 2 DP lanes
with the USB SS lanes onto the usb-c-connector. If that is the EC for
ChromeOS, then the EC should have a binding that accepts some number of
input ports for DP. The EC would act as a drm_bridge, or in this case
probably two bridges, and also as two type-c switches for each
drm_bridge corresponding to the usb-c-connector nodes. When DP is on the
cable, the type-c switch/mux would signal to the drm_bridge that the
display is 'connected' via DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT and struct
drm_bridge_funcs::detect(). Then the drm_bridge in this anx part would
implement struct drm_bridge_funcs::atomic_enable() and configure the
crosspoint switch the right way depending on the reg property of the
output node in port@1.

Because you don't have the part that implements the orientation-switch,
you don't need to implement the code for it. I think simply adding
support in the binding for mode-switch and orientation-switch if this is
directly wired to a usb-c-connector should be sufficient. Those
properties would be at the top-level and not part of the graph binding.