Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp547517rwr; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:12:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YmM2YtJ0fPa4c5EGtVN+Kl3gnRMh8e4+YCGrKuLQTJr6R1KEEJoHn7kIA3D9Qw7+hpHvN2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:dacc:b0:1a6:4127:857 with SMTP id q12-20020a170902dacc00b001a641270857mr1655140plx.5.1681985556832; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:12:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681985556; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pCypYhLIQLpQXhBgHGtxqjUKGwBvSsmJqmpdyKAHbdKuS53cndOo/WIqvK4r4pJ8lc B81WLFx/oDFieJ+rLPVpzEz+WZE/xJkUr+Uxlg/ywp31bhCRMc+5y1UnKHcONwItxefx LMXvQYLqitJVWjIPC4o/lQXvOoHrLVPbveOf68VkxjwKdg8SvWbwwx3xZg3p6ciX7fOt f/t5a4R94vAmtwXQvpegQFpUWE/r71kn/IgobJT3rbAi4uH+c2VVsQJS++WzT9xl+FYo XF4SmA1AUt4YojRk80vcUR3nV3/af3hGS0ylO6d4fBJCwgyDGDl911iakmdkmnRi4dNv 5N/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=T8KFkBmkTFMyEOWPyun7d9G/q/7DX65vNv6H+RHdmhQ=; b=C47jYfuO+b1q897h94UNYDaPt/yzwZxQlB0ReFyBWARbuYgXWFWsGKrF+aeolHC9TZ ARnZq1AvkuTecHi1x8ZRqOvRsjTpXo8OAewydAhtI4xyMbAgJ9GvDGT6tjqh4maVJD9J z0JBu7e27D/c9Oej4EGwVC6vdghdONdw2/+/LcacDr/4vbf1vu7/lp5aa4WiLa/ekB5E S+VMqtji+pbNqrYeaPdwDi780ijUuvdrF3g0Ic0Qo6Hud5IyPtwPiKg7NoA/TBFC3SvX 2wsdlU3AeP/MdyuGhbDD+ryA+x87jsmi13WPvg9osZeh5GTHJVrPaVR/qupVxKdAfoqr AlCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h18-20020a170902f55200b001a0767b58e7si1617322plf.68.2023.04.20.03.12.19; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234571AbjDTKMP (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:12:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54508 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234300AbjDTKLt (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:11:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.zhaoxin.com (mx2.zhaoxin.com [203.110.167.99]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28BFE9EE1 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:08:30 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1681985308-1eb14e63882dfa0001-xx1T2L Received: from ZXSHMBX2.zhaoxin.com (ZXSHMBX2.zhaoxin.com [10.28.252.164]) by mx2.zhaoxin.com with ESMTP id UldYrculNOYAjf4U (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:08:28 +0800 (CST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.28.252.164 Received: from zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) by ZXSHMBX2.zhaoxin.com (10.28.252.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:08:28 +0800 Received: from [10.29.8.21] (10.29.8.21) by zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:08:27 +0800 X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.28.252.164 Message-ID: X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.29.8.21 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:08:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin Content-Language: en-US X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin To: Greg KH CC: , , , , References: <20230420172130.375819-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com> From: "WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.29.8.21] X-ClientProxiedBy: ZXSHCAS1.zhaoxin.com (10.28.252.161) To zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) X-Barracuda-Connect: ZXSHMBX2.zhaoxin.com[10.28.252.164] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1681985308 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 X-Barracuda-URL: https://10.28.252.36:4443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at zhaoxin.com X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 1179 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.09 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12_2 X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.107673 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.01 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date 3.10 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12_2 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12_2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/4/20 17:29, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 01:21:27AM +0800, Weitao Wang wrote: >> Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin. >> >> Weitao Wang (3): >> xhci: Add a quirk for zhaoxin xhci to fix issues. >> xhci: Add zhaoxin xHCI U1/U2 feature support >> xhci: Show zhaoxin xHCI root hub speed correctly >> >> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 5 ++++ >> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.32.0 >> > > Do these replace: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420093603.3344-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com > or are they on top of them? > This [patch 2/3] and [patch 3/3] share a xhci quirk flag XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST, So I put these independent functional patch in this set group. Above url and below url are independent xHCI patch for zhaoxin. Is it more suitable to put all the patch for zhaoxin xhci in one group? I Hope to receive your guidance. Thanks! https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230420104826.4727-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com/ Best Regards, Weitao > thanks, > > greg k-h > .