Received: by 2002:a05:6358:9144:b0:117:f937:c515 with SMTP id r4csp592605rwr; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:57:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350azwOnnbnwJNvWnMJTsxVp4ML7kzk2fkmZqxYv7z06qlC2tr0nz43uIo3pmXtOYpwEjAKQX X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:cc6:b0:63b:8a00:4580 with SMTP id b6-20020a056a000cc600b0063b8a004580mr1130432pfv.0.1681988276350; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:57:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681988276; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Rtt8cAxCOKL11rlSWI7XuV9ZbLxP4+ymcdNM4euty7ZVQCK6KXvZnFnvF0xWjY3ZTv ONMqrEff7qHKBAsdh+ErXD53USXo+t9yDsqH04mNIh/Wd2KFnz+j0svXXK3BRx9MhrAi i4LhBIIZ+1P06XMDbStcrHp/7qAiVFNL63e0QCXrFPqClHyjhiMMQE6npEn16rilptSh WTSTochiKAbC4RXznaDQbtHz/Cyis/n0a47G4tajU9Jmkh2veunkm0Xmy7V+VbC6brHL UrOGYfpwrOVdhW1gp0XqPErbMnouTEh9HxM73uLHrJiQsWsssMYg4MuRJe2lBBL5tjce 9Ivg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=eM/bbS9WflvzKKWIfx+jLsxSVcQoWaZ6xsaA8rVouFE=; b=De2mtFrfi0ZrvSAXIqDybDtTWtCp+VNgM19eiXQn6OdaudXiJTjJYxZzdchqf8dySq P72uWPOp0joE+rO0BSpCjhz8y0U1StQ3CH5kgNfdVBHstULXfuMN+ZjdEuo12SOUjvWN tu0Uen/jwzn+KVcYOLnMOKk+Ch1QvT4p5vluJD94r5Hj6uIF4lsDJRw555QL6lJDCBsn f08PjCg6xwJ2DerNxbjIqmZuCH5hajoC3lQhIqthwWuJkZF60VB0xwyze+CeYNRHJsP9 ousGuy19zfQboZUDToxufg91AXHynaDJ6sOkGMLNsog+ssn5t7abKIe3uFWB3knnkgSN WD/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Diag6ujN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i7-20020a654847000000b0051b1542d6efsi1360874pgs.213.2023.04.20.03.57.43; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ibm.com header.s=pp1 header.b=Diag6ujN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234675AbjDTK5Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:57:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41820 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235120AbjDTK4s (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:56:48 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AB25170A for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 33KA6Zg5015906; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:12 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=eM/bbS9WflvzKKWIfx+jLsxSVcQoWaZ6xsaA8rVouFE=; b=Diag6ujNdT0etL8gWSW0SL0CrJvegkjvLvWFrr0ceVp58z8au8cUiRrk2guXw3DSLSL4 f11ot3Lz9/+kfnSXIT2ud2zTxdOl5HDmvLGS1yOU17OuxbUyCGBfjkL4ds6yiNTgxyKH X85wcjJPym86W9mxUSsODatWX/7h6EMwO37nPgRyRaOVVnuVT84AvhXiqmQAPJa9jYF3 h7nSRbTO2dqADwm/AIWzU8I1nHKCfKuPoHhlFLoJygXjs9nVyYQ5jW6E6q14ae0Ojleg H/v4aYD1cJvOXCsF6aRduj2OjWw1FKCide5tt9jf0SgW2Hz+h82rKchrtBjsvHgck+r6 kA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3q31v1cx2r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:12 +0000 Received: from m0353726.ppops.net (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 33KAcphK024287; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:11 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3q31v1cx1e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:11 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 33J7bMF4006465; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:08 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.230]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pykj6bbaf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:08 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 33KAs6ew24248938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:06 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7669E2004B; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D29920040; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.40.70]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:54:05 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 13:54:03 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Peter Xu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , David Hildenbrand , Mike Rapoport , Axel Rasmussen , Leonardo Bras Soares Passos Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/31] selftests/mm: UFFDIO_API test Message-ID: References: <20230412163922.327282-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20230412164257.328375-1-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230412164257.328375-1-peterx@redhat.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: JLNC56jIXz60lHVpOE4tYXeZywynNx6a X-Proofpoint-GUID: XpsqNRY_z0qR0ltFm0kE0siiCjNk5FaB X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-04-20_06,2023-04-20_01,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303200000 definitions=main-2304200085 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:42:57PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > Add one simple test for UFFDIO_API. With that, I also added a bunch of > small but handy helpers along the way. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) > --- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c > index 6857388783be..bb492c258486 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-unit-tests.c > @@ -9,9 +9,116 @@ > > #ifdef __NR_userfaultfd > > +static void uffd_test_report(void) > +{ > + printf("Userfaults unit tests: pass=%u, skip=%u, fail=%u (total=%u)\n", > + ksft_get_pass_cnt(), > + ksft_get_xskip_cnt(), > + ksft_get_fail_cnt(), > + ksft_test_num()); > +} > + > +static void uffd_test_pass(void) > +{ > + printf("done\n"); > + ksft_inc_pass_cnt(); > +} > + > +#define uffd_test_start(...) do { \ > + printf("Testing "); \ > + printf(__VA_ARGS__); \ > + printf("... "); \ > + fflush(stdout); \ > + } while (0) > + > +#define uffd_test_fail(...) do { \ > + printf("failed [reason: "); \ > + printf(__VA_ARGS__); \ > + printf("]\n"); \ > + ksft_inc_fail_cnt(); \ > + } while (0) > + > +#define uffd_test_skip(...) do { \ > + printf("skipped [reason: "); \ > + printf(__VA_ARGS__); \ > + printf("]\n"); \ > + ksft_inc_xskip_cnt(); \ > + } while (0) > + > +/* > + * Returns 1 if specific userfaultfd supported, 0 otherwise. Note, we'll > + * return 1 even if some test failed as long as uffd supported, because in > + * that case we still want to proceed with the rest uffd unit tests. > + */ > +static int test_uffd_api(bool use_dev) > +{ > + struct uffdio_api uffdio_api; > + int uffd; > + > + uffd_test_start("UFFDIO_API (with %s)", > + use_dev ? "/dev/userfaultfd" : "syscall"); > + > + if (use_dev) > + uffd = uffd_open_dev(UFFD_FLAGS); > + else > + uffd = uffd_open_sys(UFFD_FLAGS); > + if (uffd < 0) { > + uffd_test_skip("cannot open userfaultfd handle"); > + return 0; > + } > + > + /* Test wrong UFFD_API */ > + uffdio_api.api = 0xab; > + uffdio_api.features = 0; > + if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api) == 0) { > + uffd_test_fail("UFFDIO_API should fail with wrong api but didn't"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* Test wrong feature bit */ > + uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API; > + uffdio_api.features = BIT_ULL(63); > + if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api) == 0) { > + uffd_test_fail("UFFDIO_API should fail with wrong feature but didn't"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* Test normal UFFDIO_API */ > + uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API; > + uffdio_api.features = 0; > + if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api)) { > + uffd_test_fail("UFFDIO_API should succeed but failed"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* Test double requests of UFFDIO_API with a random feature set */ > + uffdio_api.features = BIT_ULL(0); > + if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api) == 0) { > + uffd_test_fail("UFFDIO_API should reject initialized uffd"); > + goto out; > + } > + > + uffd_test_pass(); > +out: > + close(uffd); > + /* We have a valid uffd handle */ > + return 1; > +} > + > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > - return KSFT_PASS; > + int has_uffd; > + > + has_uffd = test_uffd_api(false); > + has_uffd |= test_uffd_api(true); > + > + if (!has_uffd) { > + printf("Userfaultfd not supported or unprivileged, skip all tests\n"); > + exit(KSFT_SKIP); > + } > + uffd_test_report(); > + > + return ksft_get_fail_cnt() ? KSFT_FAIL : KSFT_PASS; > } > > #else /* __NR_userfaultfd */ > -- > 2.39.1 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.