Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <658fe430-320f-5f4f-2011-9e1bd11d772c@bytedance.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2023 19:08:24 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two warnings about rq clock
To:     mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
        juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
        mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
        mgorman@techsingularity.net
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230410081206.23441-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
From:   Hao Jia <jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230410081206.23441-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

kindly ping...


On 2023/4/10 Hao Jia wrote:
> These two patches fix two warnings about rq clock
> 
> Patch1 fixes the warning of using the old rq clock caused by
> missing update rq clock.
> 
> Patch2 fixes the warning that the rq clock was updated multiple
> times while holding the rq lock.
> 
> Hao Jia (2):
>    sched/core: Fixed missing rq clock update before calling
>      set_rq_offline()
>    sched/core: Avoid double calling update_rq_clock()
> 
>   kernel/sched/core.c     | 11 +++++++----
>   kernel/sched/fair.c     |  9 ++++++---
>   kernel/sched/topology.c | 10 ++++++----
>   3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>