Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <b031f528-f3dd-44ed-5370-2133a74f9332@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:27:40 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: remove unnessary comment in __may_age_extent_tree
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Qi Han <hanqi@vivo.com>, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20230418060954.67585-1-hanqi@vivo.com>
From:   Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230418060954.67585-1-hanqi@vivo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2023/4/18 14:09, Qi Han wrote:
> This comment make no sense and is in the wrong place, so let's
> remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Han <hanqi@vivo.com>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index 28b12553f2b3..1f6d7de35794 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static bool __may_age_extent_tree(struct inode *inode)
>   
>   	if (!test_opt(sbi, AGE_EXTENT_CACHE))
>   		return false;
> -	/* don't cache block age info for cold file */
>   	if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_COMPRESSED_FILE))
>   		return false;

Should move it here instead of removal?

/* don't cache block age info for cold file */

>   	if (file_is_cold(inode))