Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To:     <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>,
        Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
CC:     <nakato@nakato.io>, <korneld@chromium.org>, <richard.gong@amd.com>,
        <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
        <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: amd: Detect and mask spurious interrupts
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 07:06:23 -0500
Message-ID: <20230421120625.3366-4-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230421120625.3366-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
References: <20230421120625.3366-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Apr 2023 12:06:42.2486
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 10e80c02-f0de-4057-7be2-08db4260deb9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CO1NAM11FT093.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: IA1PR12MB6436
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FORGED_SPF_HELO,
        RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,
        T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
        version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Kornel Dulęba <korneld@chromium.org>

Leverage gpiochip_line_is_irq to check whether a pin has an irq
associated with it. The previous check ("irq == 0") didn't make much
sense. The irq variable refers to the pinctrl irq, and has nothing do to
with an individual pin.

On some systems, during suspend/resume cycle, the firmware leaves
an interrupt enabled on a pin that is not used by the kernel.
Without this patch that caused an interrupt storm.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217315
Signed-off-by: Kornel Dulęba <korneld@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
index 24465010397b..675c9826b78a 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
@@ -660,21 +660,21 @@ static bool do_amd_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
 			 * We must read the pin register again, in case the
 			 * value was changed while executing
 			 * generic_handle_domain_irq() above.
-			 * If we didn't find a mapping for the interrupt,
-			 * disable it in order to avoid a system hang caused
-			 * by an interrupt storm.
+			 * If the line is not an irq, disable it in order to
+			 * avoid a system hang caused by an interrupt storm.
 			 */
 			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
 			regval = readl(regs + i);
-			if (irq == 0) {
-				regval &= ~BIT(INTERRUPT_ENABLE_OFF);
+			if (!gpiochip_line_is_irq(gc, irqnr + i)) {
+				regval &= ~BIT(INTERRUPT_MASK_OFF);
 				dev_dbg(&gpio_dev->pdev->dev,
 					"Disabling spurious GPIO IRQ %d\n",
 					irqnr + i);
+			} else {
+				ret = true;
 			}
 			writel(regval, regs + i);
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
-			ret = true;
 		}
 	}
 	/* did not cause wake on resume context for shared IRQ */
-- 
2.34.1