Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756098AbXI1TES (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:04:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751613AbXI1TEM (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:04:12 -0400 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:41389 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751074AbXI1TEK (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:04:10 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:03:54 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Andrew Morton Cc: LKML , uml-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML - Fix locking in skb alloction failure fix Message-ID: <20070928190354.GA9000@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20070928154314.GA7185@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20070928112634.0bef9525.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070928112634.0bef9525.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 590 Lines: 16 On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:26:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Doesn't this assume that the arch is only ever uniprocessor, which I > don't think is true on i386 UML?? It is for now, and when that changes, I haven't decided if and when interrupts will be received on multiple CPUs. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/