Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:39:24 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To:     "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        "Ismail, Mustafa" <mustafa.ismail@intel.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
        "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-team@fb.com" <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/irdma: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from
 alloc_ordered_workqueue() call
Message-ID: <ZEKgHNlykqw7LmKm@ziepe.ca>
References: <ZEGW-IcFReR1juVM@slm.duckdns.org>
 <MWHPR11MB0029F5F9C9AC249F2BC3E981E9609@MWHPR11MB0029.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR11MB0029F5F9C9AC249F2BC3E981E9609@MWHPR11MB0029.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 02:29:06PM +0000, Saleem, Shiraz wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/irdma: Drop spurious WQ_UNBOUND from
> > alloc_ordered_workqueue() call
> > 
> > Workqueue is in the process of cleaning up the distinction between unbound
> > workqueues w/ @nr_active==1 and ordered workqueues. Explicit
> > WQ_UNBOUND isn't needed for alloc_ordered_workqueue() and will trigger a
> > warning in the future. Let's remove it. This doesn't cause any functional
> > changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/hw.c
> > @@ -1901,8 +1901,8 @@ int irdma_ctrl_init_hw(struct irdma_pci_
> >  			break;
> >  		rf->init_state = CEQ0_CREATED;
> >  		/* Handles processing of CQP completions */
> > -		rf->cqp_cmpl_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("cqp_cmpl_wq",
> > -						WQ_HIGHPRI |
> > WQ_UNBOUND);
> > +		rf->cqp_cmpl_wq =
> > +			alloc_ordered_workqueue("cqp_cmpl_wq",
> > WQ_HIGHPRI);
> >  		if (!rf->cqp_cmpl_wq) {
> >  			status = -ENOMEM;
> >  			break;
> 
> Acked-by: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>

Tejun, do you want this in your tree too?

Thanks
Jason