Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <fb93e95f-181f-917d-9216-a81dec1a2959@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:26:51 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] dt-bindings: display: simple: add support
 for InnoLux G070ACE-L01
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>, richard.leitner@linux.dev
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
References: <20230201-innolux-g070ace-v2-0-2371e251dd40@skidata.com>
 <20230201-innolux-g070ace-v2-1-2371e251dd40@skidata.com>
 <CAD=FV=XJCtqep+92h3gLfs4o2TwvL4MORjc9ydTSpZiZ0dsR0w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=XJCtqep+92h3gLfs4o2TwvL4MORjc9ydTSpZiZ0dsR0w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 21/04/2023 18:15, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:51 AM <richard.leitner@linux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
>>
>> Add Innolux G070ACE-L01 7" WVGA (800x480) TFT LCD panel compatible
>> string.
>>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
> 
> nit: as I understand it, ordering of tags is usually supposed to be
> chronological. You signed off on this patch before Krzysztof acked it,
> so the SoB should be above. I'll fix that when applying.

Some people agree with this... but b4 disagrees, so I would say the
tools should implement the right process and right decisions. We should
not be correcting the tools' output, unless the tools are not correct -
then fix the tools.


Best regards,
Krzysztof