Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756756AbXI1VAg (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:00:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754372AbXI1VAW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:00:22 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:35661 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753806AbXI1VAU (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:00:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:04:46 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Mark Lord Cc: Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Len Brown , Venkatesh Pallipadi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes Message-ID: <20070928220446.3f3b839e@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <46FD639D.9030301@rtr.ca> References: <20070922220347.586903979@linutronix.de> <46FD639D.9030301@rtr.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.10.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 607 Lines: 11 > And also, I wonder if at a minimum we should be guaranteeing ACPI BIOS calls > only ever happen from CPU#0 (or the "boot" CPU)? Or do we do that already? The real question that matters is "does windows" which possibly someone who touches Windows can definitively answer. For APM we lock to CPU 0 and have to because its what MS did, not because of the spec. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/