Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To:     mark.rutland@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: smccc: set variables smccc_soc_id_version,revision storage-class-specifier to static
Date:   Sun, 23 Apr 2023 11:34:28 -0400
Message-Id: <20230423153428.3938525-1-trix@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

smatch reports
drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:20:21: warning: symbol
  'smccc_soc_id_version' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:21:21: warning: symbol
  'smccc_soc_id_revision' was not declared. Should it be static?

These variables are only used in their defining file so should be static

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
index db818f9dcb8e..0cf4c45de417 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ static enum arm_smccc_conduit smccc_conduit = SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE;
 
 bool __ro_after_init smccc_trng_available = false;
 u64 __ro_after_init smccc_has_sve_hint = false;
-s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_version = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
-s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_revision = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+static s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_version = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
+static s32 __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_revision = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;
 
 void __init arm_smccc_version_init(u32 version, enum arm_smccc_conduit conduit)
 {
-- 
2.27.0