Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <87d022be08cf911178cfb8182598a1689b050845.camel@mniewoehner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes
From:   Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Niew=F6hner?= <linux@mniewoehner.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc:     peterhuewe@gmx.de, jgg@ziepe.ca, stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        jandryuk@gmail.com, pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de, l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com,
        lukas@wunner.de, p.rosenberger@kunbus.com
In-Reply-To: <CS4767IVV0V2.2E9IH70NE7FGQ@suppilovahvero>
References: <20221124135538.31020-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
         <4c094418-7725-b815-f1f9-8b12f1ac4d72@gmx.de>
         <c02493fac223707de39e44d51b0a0ce512565250.camel@mniewoehner.de>
         <20230319135338.c7k6r3ws6lby5qgv@kernel.org> <ZEK+w3Q++vu4Kl5x@kernel.org>
         <a93b6222-edda-d43c-f010-a59701f2aeef@gmx.de>
         <CS4767IVV0V2.2E9IH70NE7FGQ@suppilovahvero>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date:   Sun, 23 Apr 2023 17:36:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 17:15 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat Apr 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM EEST, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 21.04.23 18:50, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I tested this with libvirt/QEMU/swtpm and did the following tests:
> > > 
> > > 1. TPM 1.2 suspend/resume.
> > > 2. TPM 2.0 kselftest.
> > > 3. TPM 2.0 suspend/resume + kselftest.
> > > 
> > > I see no issues so I can pick this for my pull request.
> > > 
> > > Tests were performed on top of v6.3-rc7.
> > > 
> > > For all:
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > BR, Jarkko
> > 
> > Thats great, thanks a lot for testing this!
> 
> Thanks for the patience! I'm sorry it took so long but at least all the
> steps in v11 make perfect sense and I see nothing that would rise red
> flags. So we can land this with good confidence I think.
> 
> BR, Jarkko

I wonder, if it makes sense to submit this patch series to longterm and/or at
least stable?

BR Michael