Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date:   Sun, 23 Apr 2023 18:40:59 +0300
Message-Id: <CS48ZBNWI6T9.1CU08I6KDVM65@suppilovahvero>
To:     =?utf-8?q?Michael_Niew=C3=B6hner?= <linux@mniewoehner.de>,
        "Lino Sanfilippo" <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc:     <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <jandryuk@gmail.com>, <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
        <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>, <lukas@wunner.de>,
        <p.rosenberger@kunbus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] TPM IRQ fixes
From:   "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
References: <20221124135538.31020-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
 <4c094418-7725-b815-f1f9-8b12f1ac4d72@gmx.de>
 <c02493fac223707de39e44d51b0a0ce512565250.camel@mniewoehner.de>
 <20230319135338.c7k6r3ws6lby5qgv@kernel.org> <ZEK+w3Q++vu4Kl5x@kernel.org>
 <a93b6222-edda-d43c-f010-a59701f2aeef@gmx.de>
 <CS4767IVV0V2.2E9IH70NE7FGQ@suppilovahvero>
 <87d022be08cf911178cfb8182598a1689b050845.camel@mniewoehner.de>
In-Reply-To: <87d022be08cf911178cfb8182598a1689b050845.camel@mniewoehner.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun Apr 23, 2023 at 6:36 PM EEST, Michael Niew=C3=B6hner wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 17:15 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Sat Apr 22, 2023 at 3:59 AM EEST, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > On 21.04.23 18:50, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > > I tested this with libvirt/QEMU/swtpm and did the following tests:
> > > >=20
> > > > 1. TPM 1.2 suspend/resume.
> > > > 2. TPM 2.0 kselftest.
> > > > 3. TPM 2.0 suspend/resume + kselftest.
> > > >=20
> > > > I see no issues so I can pick this for my pull request.
> > > >=20
> > > > Tests were performed on top of v6.3-rc7.
> > > >=20
> > > > For all:
> > > >=20
> > > > Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > > >=20
> > > > BR, Jarkko
> > >=20
> > > Thats great, thanks a lot for testing this!
> >=20
> > Thanks for the patience! I'm sorry it took so long but at least all the
> > steps in v11 make perfect sense and I see nothing that would rise red
> > flags. So we can land this with good confidence I think.
> >=20
> > BR, Jarkko
>
> I wonder, if it makes sense to submit this patch series to longterm and/o=
r at
> least stable?

it's a feature, so I don't think so.

BR, Jarkko