Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230420121615.967487-1-d-gole@ti.com> <24ec3728-9720-ae6a-9ff5-3e2e13a96f76@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <24ec3728-9720-ae6a-9ff5-3e2e13a96f76@gmail.com>
From:   Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:20:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOiHx==7TV3879ADbiWGbHT0NysNck4FUQXkXEocjkD2BzEoRA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm63xx: remove PM_SLEEP based conditional compilation
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc:     Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@ti.com>, Vignesh <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Apurva Nandan <a-nandan@ti.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
        Tanguy Bouzeloc <tanguy.bouzeloc@efixo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 19:17, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/20/23 05:16, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> > Get rid of conditional compilation based on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP because
> > it may introduce build issues with certain configs where it maybe disabled
> > This is because if above config is not enabled the suspend-resume
> > functions are never part of the code but the bcm63xx_spi_pm_ops struct
> > still inits them to non-existent suspend-resume functions.
> >
> > Fixes: b42dfed83d95 ("spi: add Broadcom BCM63xx SPI controller driver")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c | 2 --
> >   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c
> > index 96633a0051b1..99395932074c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm63xx.c
> > @@ -617,7 +617,6 @@ static void bcm63xx_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       clk_disable_unprepare(bs->clk);
> >   }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >   static int bcm63xx_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
> Don't we need a __maybe_unused here?

Actually the premise of this patch is wrong, and should rather be reverted.

The bcm63xx_spi_pm_ops struct is initialized with
SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(), which is defined as

#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
#define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn) \
SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn)
#else
#define SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(suspend_fn, resume_fn)
#endif

so for !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP it won't initialize the struct at all (or
reference non-existing functions), and therefore there will be no
build issues.

Regards,
Jonas