Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
To:     <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <jdelvare@suse.com>,
        <linux@roeck-us.net>, <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <n-francis@ti.com>, <nm@ti.com>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        <u-kumar1@ti.com>, <kristo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: misc: esm: Add ESM support for TI K3 devices
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2023 15:23:29 +0530
Message-ID: <20230424095331.45351-2-n-francis@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230424095331.45351-1-n-francis@ti.com>
References: <20230424095331.45351-1-n-francis@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Document the binding for TI K3 ESM (Error Signaling Module) block.

Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
---
 .../bindings/hwmon/ti,j721e-esm.yaml          | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,j721e-esm.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,j721e-esm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,j721e-esm.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c5eb7f46cc46
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ti,j721e-esm.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright (C) 2022 Texas Instruments Incorporated
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/ti,j721e-esm.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Texas Instruments K3 ESM
+
+maintainers:
+  - Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
+
+description:
+  The ESM (Error Signaling Module) is an IP block on TI K3 devices
+  that allows handling of safety events somewhat similar to what interrupt
+  controller would do. The safety signals have their separate paths within
+  the SoC, and they are handled by the ESM, which routes them to the proper
+  destination, which can be system reset, interrupt controller, etc. In the
+  simplest configuration the signals are just routed to reset the SoC.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: ti,j721e-esm
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  ti,esm-pins:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
+    description:
+      integer array of ESM interrupt pins to route to external event pin
+      which can be used to reset the SoC.
+    minItems: 1
+    maxItems: 255
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - ti,esm-pins
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    bus {
+        #address-cells = <2>;
+        #size-cells = <2>;
+        esm@700000 {
+            compatible = "ti,j721e-esm";
+            reg = <0x0 0x700000 0x0 0x1000>;
+            ti,esm-pins = <344>, <345>;
+        };
+    };
-- 
2.34.1