Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2023 17:31:34 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>,
        jsnitsel@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de,
        jgg@ziepe.ca, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, skomatineni@nvidia.com, ldewangan@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch V10 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Add hardware wait polling
Message-ID: <ZEag1lAonYcmNFXk@orome>
References: <20230421091309.2672-1-kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>
 <20230421091309.2672-3-kyarlagadda@nvidia.com>
 <CS48A9Y752N4.QEM73WVMZYLQ@suppilovahvero>
 <3df39f0b-70dc-4b42-bae1-72c07607cbc7@sirena.org.uk>
 <ZEaWQD_QTs2usVl8@orome>
 <5fae29cd-d5f4-4616-be1c-1cd4d5b9a538@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HoxvrgZmmApzwDPp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5fae29cd-d5f4-4616-be1c-1cd4d5b9a538@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.10 (2023-03-25)
Precedence: bulk


--HoxvrgZmmApzwDPp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:18:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:46:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>=20
> > Would it make sense for you to pick up patch 2/3 as well? As far as I
> > can tell there's a build dependency on patch 1/3 because of the newly
> > added SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW symbol.
>=20
> I'll include it in my pull request for spi this time round so it should
> end up in -rc1, my thinking was that I was happy with the SPI bits and
> if it was in -rc1 then the TPM bits could be handled without cross tree
> issues when the review was sorted (which it is now but wasn't at the
> time).  If the SPI side doesn't make -rc1 for some reason I can pick up
> the TPM bit as well, and/or do a signed tag.

Sounds good.

Thanks,
Thierry

--HoxvrgZmmApzwDPp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0QL7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HoxvrgZmmApzwDPp--