From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] Combine path_put and path_put_conditional
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:21:30 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
Cc: jblunck@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
       hch@lst.de, tiwai@suse.de
References: <20070927141200.820970144@X40.localnet> <200709282243.51243.agruen@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <200709282243.51243.agruen@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200709300021.32077.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 697
Lines: 22

Hi Andreas,

On Friday 28 September 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> The name path_put_conditional (formerly, dput_path) is a little unclear.
> Replace (path_put_conditional + path_put) with path_walk_put_both,
> "put a pair of paths after a path_walk" (see the kerneldoc).
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So why not name it path_walk_put_pair() then?

Rationale: "_both" is just counting, "_pair" 
	means they are related somehow.


Best regards

Ingo Oeser
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/